Notice
Opinions are personal, and only those of the authors themselves. This blog is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice. Copyright reserved 2010-2012.ABA Journal Honoree
-
Most Recent Posts
- David Udell Blogs on New Jerseys Consideration of Bar Admission Pro Bono Requirment
- Guest Blogger Magistrate Simon Mole on How Colorado’s Early Experiments with Proactive Case Processing are Fascinating from an ATJ Perspective
- National Center for State Courts Strategic Campaign Prioritizes Access to Justice and Sets Rules Simplification as Objective
- Time for An Overall Evaluation of the ATJ Commission Network?
- Towards a New Accss-Friendly Rules Project
- Briefing Paper on Natural Alliance Between Legal Aid and Philanthropy
- Thoughts from the Canadian Envisioning Equal Justice Summit — Parallel Paths to Innovation and Access
- Interesting Simplifiation/Right to Counsel Argument from Justice Sotamayor in Immigration Case
- Paul Krugman Nails the “Excel Depression” — And Reminds Us of the Risks of Errors When You Rely on Data
- What a Day at the White House!
Posts by Month
Posts by Category
- Access to Counsel (50)
- Access to Justice Boards (40)
- Access to Justice Generally (139)
- Administative Proecdure (4)
- Attorney-Client (3)
- Bankruptcy (1)
- Books (1)
- Budget Issues (17)
- Child Support (5)
- Consumer Rights (5)
- Court Fees and Costs (1)
- Court Management (33)
- Criminal Law (10)
- Defender Programs (4)
- Dept. of Justice (25)
- Document Assembly (30)
- Domestic Violence (9)
- E-filing (2)
- Federal Courts (5)
- Foreclosure (21)
- Forms (38)
- Funding (86)
- Guest Bloggers (3)
- Immigration (2)
- Incubators (1)
- International Cooperation (1)
- International Models (8)
- IOLTA (7)
- Judicial Ethics (50)
- Law Schools (35)
- Legal Aid (51)
- Legal Ethics (23)
- LEP (41)
- Libraries (15)
- LSC (38)
- Media (5)
- Mediation (3)
- Medical System Comparision (14)
- Meetings (24)
- Metrics (8)
- Middle Income (20)
- Mixed Model (6)
- Mobile Technology (14)
- Newsmaker Interview (9)
- Non-Lawyer Practice (3)
- Outcome Measures (5)
- Plain Language (1)
- Poverty (6)
- Pro Bono (43)
- Public Defender (3)
- Research and Evalation (94)
- Rules Reform (1)
- Science (12)
- Self-Help Services (107)
- Simplification (15)
- Social Media (1)
- Software Developers (2)
- SRL Statistics (8)
- Supreme Court (32)
- Systematic Change (78)
- Technology (131)
- This Blog (13)
- Tools (5)
- Transparency (11)
- Triage (26)
- Unbundling (30)
- Uncategorized (6)
- Usabilty (1)
- Veterans (1)
- Vocation (2)
Tags
Awards Broadband California Canada Child Support Conference of Chief Justices Court Watching Data Mining Discovery e-filing Elder Equity Ownership Family Law Florida Harvard HHS Holocaust Human Rights Illinois Immigration Incubator Justice Corps Laurence Tribe Lawyer Referral Massachusetts Missouri Montana NCSC New York Parole Retail Access satisfaction Sentencing SJI South Carolina Texas TIG Turner v. Rogers UK Unemployment UPL Veterans video West Virginia ZelonAccess to Justice Links
- American Judges Association Blog
- ABA Access to Justice Support Center
- Concurrent Opinions Blog
- Court Technology Bulletin Blog
- Dept. of Justice ATJ Initiative
- International Access to Justice Blog (Martin Gramatikov)
- LawHelp Self-Help Site
- LawyerWatch
- Lewis Kinard’s Unbundling Blog
- Legal Servces Corp
- National Assoc. of IOLTA Programs
- NLADA
- Pro Bono Net
- SelfHelpSupport Practitioner Site
- State Justice Institute
- Virtual Law Practice Blog
- Zorza Site
RSS and More
Category Archives: IOLTA
Massachussets Pioneers Economic Benefit Statement
The Massachusetts Legal Assistance Corporation (state granting program) has released a 2011 Economic Benefit Statement. Key language: The work of MLAC-funded legal aid programs substantially boosts the Commonwealth’s economy each year by bringing in tens of millions of federal dollars, … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Justice Boards, Budget Issues, Funding, IOLTA
Tagged Cost Benefit
Leave a comment
LSC Budget News — Not Good
NLDA Legal Aid News sends out the bad news: Last night House and Senate conferees agreed to a spending package that would fund the Legal Services Corporation (LSC) at $348,000,000 for FY 2012. This figure represents a reduction in overall … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Justice Boards, Funding, IOLTA, LSC
2 Comments
Wayne Moore Part Two: Roles of ATJ Commissions, Pro Bono, LSC etc., and A Ten Year Vision
This is Part Two of our NewsMaker Interview with Wayne Moore, author of Delivering Legal Services to Low-Income People. Part One, here, included discussion of what Wayne has learned about how a system should be built, what components it should … Continue reading
Wayne Moore Discusses His Comprehensive Vision for Legal Aid Programs — Part One of Our NewsMaker Interview
Wayne Moore has been an access to justice leader for almost 30 years. Two of his greatest achievements have been helping to conceptualize and operationalize the hotline and pro bono movements. He has now drawn upon his long experience to … Continue reading
Stabilizing IOLTA Funding — Long Term Strategy
Bloomberg and others are reporting on administration proposals to reduce the burden on the states of the huge accumulated UI debt to the feds that many states are now carrying. This set me thinking about how one long term strategy … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Justice Generally, Funding, IOLTA, Systematic Change
Tagged Filing Fee, Unemployment Insurance
1 Comment
Ontario Moves on Sign Languge Interpretation in Legal Context — A Suggestion for an IOLTA Innovation Pool
The Law Foundation of Ontario, their IOLTA program, has what we in the US would call an RFP out for projects dealing with Sign Language Interpretation in the legal system. Applicants can be “from across Canada“ The grant program comes … Continue reading
Good News on IOLTA FDIC Fix — Passes Senate and Goes to the President for Signature
As reported on the Legal Times Blog, the Senate has passed the IOLTA fix, which would ensure continuing full FDIC insurance for IOLTA deposits. The legislation now goes to the President for signature. Had this not passed (and there had … Continue reading
