Notice
Opinions are personal, and only those of the authors themselves. This blog is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice. Copyright reserved 2010-2012.ABA Journal Honoree
-
Most Recent Posts
- Important New Canadian Report Highlights Challenges Facing the Self-Represented and Innovation and Research Lessons for the US
- David Udell Blogs on New Jerseys Consideration of Bar Admission Pro Bono Requirment
- Guest Blogger Magistrate Simon Mole on How Colorado’s Early Experiments with Proactive Case Processing are Fascinating from an ATJ Perspective
- National Center for State Courts Strategic Campaign Prioritizes Access to Justice and Sets Rules Simplification as Objective
- Time for An Overall Evaluation of the ATJ Commission Network?
- Towards a New Accss-Friendly Rules Project
- Briefing Paper on Natural Alliance Between Legal Aid and Philanthropy
- Thoughts from the Canadian Envisioning Equal Justice Summit — Parallel Paths to Innovation and Access
- Interesting Simplifiation/Right to Counsel Argument from Justice Sotamayor in Immigration Case
- Paul Krugman Nails the “Excel Depression” — And Reminds Us of the Risks of Errors When You Rely on Data
Posts by Month
Posts by Category
- Access to Counsel (50)
- Access to Justice Boards (40)
- Access to Justice Generally (139)
- Administative Proecdure (4)
- Attorney-Client (3)
- Bankruptcy (1)
- Books (1)
- Budget Issues (17)
- Child Support (5)
- Consumer Rights (5)
- Court Fees and Costs (1)
- Court Management (33)
- Criminal Law (10)
- Defender Programs (4)
- Dept. of Justice (25)
- Document Assembly (30)
- Domestic Violence (9)
- E-filing (2)
- Federal Courts (5)
- Foreclosure (21)
- Forms (38)
- Funding (86)
- Guest Bloggers (3)
- Immigration (2)
- Incubators (1)
- International Cooperation (1)
- International Models (9)
- IOLTA (7)
- Judicial Ethics (50)
- Law Schools (35)
- Legal Aid (51)
- Legal Ethics (23)
- LEP (41)
- Libraries (15)
- LSC (38)
- Media (5)
- Mediation (3)
- Medical System Comparision (14)
- Meetings (24)
- Metrics (8)
- Middle Income (20)
- Mixed Model (6)
- Mobile Technology (14)
- Newsmaker Interview (9)
- Non-Lawyer Practice (3)
- Outcome Measures (5)
- Plain Language (1)
- Poverty (6)
- Pro Bono (43)
- Public Defender (3)
- Research and Evalation (95)
- Rules Reform (1)
- Science (12)
- Self-Help Services (108)
- Simplification (15)
- Social Media (1)
- Software Developers (2)
- SRL Statistics (8)
- Supreme Court (32)
- Systematic Change (78)
- Technology (131)
- This Blog (13)
- Tools (5)
- Transparency (11)
- Triage (26)
- Unbundling (30)
- Uncategorized (6)
- Usabilty (1)
- Veterans (1)
- Vocation (2)
Tags
Awards Broadband California Canada Child Support Conference of Chief Justices Court Watching Data Mining Discovery e-filing Elder Equity Ownership Family Law Florida Harvard HHS Holocaust Human Rights Illinois Immigration Incubator Justice Corps Laurence Tribe Lawyer Referral Massachusetts Missouri Montana NCSC New York Parole Retail Access satisfaction Sentencing SJI South Carolina Texas TIG Turner v. Rogers UK Unemployment UPL Veterans video West Virginia ZelonAccess to Justice Links
- American Judges Association Blog
- ABA Access to Justice Support Center
- Concurrent Opinions Blog
- Court Technology Bulletin Blog
- Dept. of Justice ATJ Initiative
- International Access to Justice Blog (Martin Gramatikov)
- LawHelp Self-Help Site
- LawyerWatch
- Lewis Kinard’s Unbundling Blog
- Legal Servces Corp
- National Assoc. of IOLTA Programs
- NLADA
- Pro Bono Net
- SelfHelpSupport Practitioner Site
- State Justice Institute
- Virtual Law Practice Blog
- Zorza Site
RSS and More
Category Archives: Legal Ethics
Memories of a Mentor, and Honoring a Prosecutor
On the 50th anniversary of Gideon v. Wainright, I keep thinking about one of my mentors, Brownlow (Browny) Speer, who died a few weeks ago. Browny was Chief Appellate Attorney of first the Massachusetts Defenders Committee, and then its successor, … Continue reading
California Bar Explores Joining Movement for Non-Lawyer Practice
Another straw in a gathering wind. This article in the California Bar Journal reports on the Bar’s Board’s exploring the possibility of limited practice professionals: The State Bar Board of Trustees has expressed interest in examining a limited-practice licensing program … Continue reading
Posted in Attorney-Client, Legal Ethics, Systematic Change
4 Comments
Non-Lawyer Practice Idea Featured on CNN Website
Professor Gillian Hadfield, who recently testified at one of the New York Access Hearings about non-lawer practice, has an important opinion piece on the CNN Website. She proves the total inadequacy of current access approaches, concluding that we simply have … Continue reading
Posted in Legal Ethics, Non-Lawyer Practice, Systematic Change
1 Comment
Non-Lawyer Practice — Moving the New York Discussion Forward
I blogged recently about testimony at the New York Access to Justice hearings about the potential of non-lawyer practice. I am now able to post the actual testimony that was briefly referenced in the Reuters story. Professor Gillian Hadfield of … Continue reading
Advocacy at New York Hearing for Non-Lawyer Access Innovations
This may be a straw in the wind. Reuters, in their report of the second of this year’s New York State hearings on Access to Justice included the following: But money alone will not solve the problem, according to testimony … Continue reading
Posted in Legal Ethics, Self-Help Services
5 Comments
Important Step Forward with Washington State Legal Technician Rule
Lots of us have been watching this long-standing but very important saga. The Washington State Supreme Court has now by Order approved a Rule generally permitting non-lawyer legal technicians. The Order does not itself authorize specific areas of legal technician … Continue reading
Posted in Legal Ethics, Simplification, Systematic Change
9 Comments
Will Hornsby Reports on Year’s Key Events
Each year, Will Hornsby, as staffer for the ABA Standing Committee on the Delivery of Legal Services, puts out a summary of key events. It is all worth a read, but particularly useful is this summary of rule and ethics … Continue reading
Setting Public Goals for Access Commissions: The Massachusetts Model
Kudos to the Massachusetts ATJ Commission for publicly setting itself objectives that are both concrete and ambitious — and for assigning groups and individuals to be responsible for moving them forward. I am particularly impressed that goals for working with … Continue reading
Coming Soon — Public Welfare Foundation Funded NCSC Access to Justice Center
Here’s a heads up. Very soon we will be seeing the launch of the Access to Justice Center of the National Center for State Courts, funded by the Public Welfare Foundation. The Center, for which I will be a consultant, … Continue reading
Should Anyone Join a Large Firm Anymore?
The New York Times has a very informative and insightful article on the apparently impending collapse of Dewey and LeBoeuf. It’s all summed up in this quote on the change in the big firm legal world: “There’s a dawning recognition … Continue reading
Posted in Legal Ethics, Pro Bono, Systematic Change
Tagged Equity Ownership, Large Firms
Leave a comment
How Others See Us in the US
Roger Smith, of the UK organization Justice, has a guest blog on Richard Moorhead’s Lawyer Blog, on “The internet and the provision of legal advice.“ It takes a somewhat pessimistic view of what has been achieved. Here are his observations … Continue reading
A shift in Empahsis About Access Demonstrated by Retired Chief Justice Marshall of Massachusetts
The retired Massachusetts Chief, in a Boston Globe op-ed, urging contributions to legal aid programs, shows an interesting shift in emphasis in terms of how we think about the access system. It’s caught in these two paras: While judges and … Continue reading
General Study of Impact of Regulation Upon Occupations.
Richard Moorhead, perceptive as usual, has noticed a recent study conducted in the UK of the impact of regulations of occupations, done for the UK Commission on Employment and Skills, and titled A review of occupational regulation and its impact. … Continue reading
Unauthorized Practice of Law Issues and the “Not Malpractice” Test
The Forbes blog has an interesting post collecting a number of recent developments in UPL. It includes a Missouri lawyers’ class action against Legal Zoom, and cases from Kentucky and Ohio. The post takes a generally anti-regulatory tone, with a … Continue reading
Legal Services at the Mall — the UK Model
As you probably know in a general way, the UK is deregulating certain aspects of the legal profession. But you may not know how fast things are changing. Here is one big consequence reported on the Legal Futures Blog. The … Continue reading
