Full Site Automatic Translation By Google
Notice
Opinions are personal, and only those of the authors themselves. This blog is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice. Copyright reserved 2010-2016.ABA Journal Honoree 2017

-
Join 903 other subscribers
Most Recent Comments
Sara Case on Judiciary Committee Democrats… james burdick on Study Showing Greater Racial B… Holly Eaton on Excuses for Not Agreeing to Re… richardzorza on Trump-Olson Retainer and Non-D… Ken Burton on Trump-Olson Retainer and Non-D… -
Most Recent Posts
- Nixon, Trump and the Nexis Between Evil Policy and Core Crimes
- How the Access To Justice Movement is Helping Constrain Trumpism
- Becky Sandefur is a MacArthur!!!
- Judiciary Committee Democrats Should Call the Republican “Assistant” as an Expert Witness on Sex Assault Reporting and Veracity
- Where the Investigation is Headed: Some Propositions
- A Telling Moment
- What a Real Apology Takes
- The Corporate Response to Trump
- Justice Kennedy’s Opinion On “Baking Discrimination” Is Clarion Call for Process Neutrality In The Entire Governmental Sphere
- Study Showing Greater Racial Bias By Republican Judges Has to Shatter Our Assumptions
Posts by Month
Top Posts & Pages
- NewsMaker Interview: Prof. Jim Greiner on the Latest Offer-Outcomes Research and its Implications
- Maybe These Poster Proposals from SRLN Will Stimulate Ideas
- Deregulation of Nonprofit Legal Practice -- An ATJ Breakthrough?
- Study on Legal Service Providers in the UK Operating as Alternative Business Structures
- The Corporate Response to Trump
- Updadates from the Turner Blog
- Nonlawyer Courtroom Navigator Follow-Up -- Initial NY Report shows Value and Impact
- Thoughts on the Shriver Study
- Hitler's Children is a Magnificent Film About Getting Beyond Your Backgroud
- A New Way of Thinking About Triage, 100% Access, and the Analysis Process
Posts by Category
- 100% Access Strategy and Campaign (56)
- ABA (15)
- Access to Counsel (80)
- Access to Justice Boards (89)
- Access to Justice Generally (340)
- Administative Proecdure (14)
- Alternative Business Structures (4)
- Anti-Trust (8)
- Appellate Practice (5)
- Appreciations (1)
- Artificial Intelligence (2)
- Attorney-Client (24)
- Bail (5)
- Bankruptcy (4)
- Bar Associations (27)
- Bias (2)
- Books (3)
- Budget Issues (35)
- Census Bureau (6)
- Chasm with Communities (17)
- Child Support (12)
- Commentators (3)
- Communications Strategy (29)
- Congress (3)
- Constitution (13)
- Consumer Rights (13)
- Contempt (1)
- Court Fees and Costs (14)
- Court Management (98)
- Criminal Law (36)
- De-Regulation (8)
- Death Penalty (1)
- Debt Collction (3)
- Defender Programs (20)
- Dept. of Justice (64)
- Discrimination (15)
- Document Assembly (50)
- Domestic Violence (16)
- E-filing (7)
- Evictions (7)
- Evidence (2)
- expungement (6)
- Family Law (11)
- Federal Agencies (11)
- Federal Courts (25)
- Foreclosure (27)
- Forms (57)
- Freedom of Expression (3)
- Funding (154)
- Guest Bloggers (9)
- History (5)
- Hospice (1)
- Housing (6)
- Humor (6)
- ILAG (1)
- Immigration (16)
- Incnetives (5)
- Incubators (13)
- International Cooperation (18)
- International Models (27)
- IOLTA (13)
- Judicial Ethics (99)
- Judicial Supremacy (4)
- Justice Index (5)
- LAIR (9)
- Law Schools (63)
- Legal Aid (119)
- Legal Ethics (46)
- Legal Insurance (1)
- LEP (59)
- LGBT (1)
- Libel Law (1)
- Libraries (18)
- Litigant Voice (4)
- Love (3)
- LSC (77)
- Mapping/GIS (5)
- Media (9)
- Mediation (7)
- Medical System Comparision (40)
- Meetings (35)
- Metrics (31)
- Middle Income (29)
- Mixed Model (17)
- Mobile Technology (21)
- Newsmaker Interview (9)
- Non-Lawyer Practice (62)
- Obituaries and Appreciations (1)
- Outcome Measures (33)
- Personal (7)
- Plain Language (11)
- Planning (12)
- Policing (8)
- Political Issues and Justice (2)
- Political Support (16)
- Poverty (19)
- Pro Bono (61)
- Public Defender (12)
- Public Education (4)
- Public Welfare Foundation (5)
- Race (2)
- Reentry (4)
- Referral Systems (7)
- Remote Services (5)
- Research and Evalation (156)
- Rules Reform (16)
- Science (20)
- Security (6)
- Self-Help Services (194)
- Series: Outcome Measures (7)
- Simplification (48)
- Small Claims (1)
- Social Media (1)
- Social Workers (4)
- Software Developers (6)
- SRL Statistics (19)
- SRLN (13)
- State of Judiciary Speeches (3)
- Supreme Court (52)
- Systematic Change (163)
- Tax Policy (3)
- Technology (216)
- This Blog (20)
- Tools (12)
- Transitions (4)
- Transparency (21)
- Triage (73)
- Unbundling (50)
- Uncategorized (10)
- Usabilty (4)
- Veterans (3)
- video (5)
- Vocation (9)
- White House (41)
Cannot load blog information at this time.
RSS and More
Links
- American Judges Association Blog
- ABA Access to Justice Support Center
- Concurrent Opinions Blog
- Court Technology Bulletin Blog
- Dept. of Justice ATJ Initiative
- International Access to Justice Blog (Martin Gramatikov)
- Justice Index
- LawHelp Self-Help Site
- LawyerWatch
- Lewis Kinard’s Unbundling Blog
- Legal Servces Corp
- National Assoc. of IOLTA Programs
- Nationaaal Center for Access to Justice
- National Coalition for a Civil Right to Counsel
- NLADA
- Pro Bono Net
- Pro Bono Net Blog – – Connecting Justice Communities
- SelfHelpSupport Practitioner Site
- Self-Represented Litigation Network
- State Justice Institute
- Technology and Access to Justice Website
- Virtual Law Practice Blog
- Zorza ATJ Site
- Zorza Politics and Humor Blog
- Zorza (Richard) Medical Status Site
- Zorzas Retirement Community
Category Archives: Budget Issues
Roger Smith on Contrast Between British Columbia and UK Legal Aid Cuts Has Valuable Lessons
I want to draw your attention to a blog post by the UK’s wonderful Roger Smith contrasting the BC and UK approach to cutting, and response to cuts in, legal aid budgets. His essential point is that the BC cuts, … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Counsel, Budget Issues, International Models, Legal Aid, LSC, Technology
1 Comment
More On Impact of DC Events on Judicial Deference to Congress
Professor Tribe has pointed out to me, in response to my recent blog post about the possible impact of DC happenings on judicial deference to Congress, that: “. . . deference to Congress isn’t either good or bad in itself, … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Justice Generally, Budget Issues, Federal Courts, Supreme Court
Comments Off on More On Impact of DC Events on Judicial Deference to Congress
Will DC Events Impact Judicial Deference to Congress
There is an interesting article in Politico today about how anger at Congress is increasing in the Federal Judiciary. The article focuses mainly on how upset the courts are at the financial impact of sequestration and the shutdown on the … Continue reading
Maryland ATJ Commission Uses Useful Techniques to Report on Economic Benefits of Legal Aid Advocacy
The Maryland Access to Justice Commission has just released a Report detailing economic benefits to the state of legal aid. As detailed in the press release, the benefits are as follows: Brought $9.9 million in federal dollars into Maryland to … Continue reading
Posted in Budget Issues, Domestic Violence, Foreclosure, Legal Aid, Outcome Measures
1 Comment
Some Thoughts on Posted Comments to the LSC Draft Strategic Plan
LSC has posted the comments they have received on the Draft Strategic Plan. Overall, the tone is positive. Here to me are the highlights, focusing perhaps more on areas of disagreement, rather than the many repeated statements of support for … Continue reading
Posted in Budget Issues, LSC, Research and Evalation
2 Comments
Access to Justice Updates from the President’s 2013 Budget Submission
Here are the headlines: LSC budget would go back up to $402 million. (LSC press release here) SJI is level-funded at $5,121,000. The Coproration for National and Community Service would get a 1.3% increase, described below by the Chronicle on … Continue reading
Posted in Budget Issues, Funding, LSC
Comments Off on Access to Justice Updates from the President’s 2013 Budget Submission
Massachussets Pioneers Economic Benefit Statement
The Massachusetts Legal Assistance Corporation (state granting program) has released a 2011 Economic Benefit Statement. Key language: The work of MLAC-funded legal aid programs substantially boosts the Commonwealth’s economy each year by bringing in tens of millions of federal dollars, … Continue reading
California Daily Journal on Costs of Cutting Self-Help Programs
The (California) Daily Journal, a legal publication, has a good story on the risk that cutting back on self-help services may end up costing more than it saves. A good article to cite to. Just a few years ago, California … Continue reading
Posted in Budget Issues, Court Management, Research and Evalation, Self-Help Services
Tagged California
Comments Off on California Daily Journal on Costs of Cutting Self-Help Programs
One Year of Blogging — Some Reflections on the Year in Access to Justice
Today is the first anniversary of this blog. 306 posts, over 16,000 web views (and maybe the same number of subscriber push views), and counting. Please celebrate with me by passing the word, and by encouraging folks to use the … Continue reading
Article on Justice Index in National Law Journal
David Udell and Cara Anna of the National Center for Access to Justice have an article in the National Law Journal on their proposed National Justice Index. The core idea: Which states’ courts are in the worst condition? Which, despite … Continue reading
Wayne Moore Makes Suggestions for Legal Aid on “How to Cut Costs Without Cutting Services”
Wayne Moore has responded to the legal aid budget crisis with this insightful and intensely practical memo on how legal aid programs can protect service delivery in a tough time. I urge all, including those who have been somewhat critical … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Justice Generally, Budget Issues, Document Assembly, Legal Aid, LSC, Pro Bono, Self-Help Services, Systematic Change, Technology, Unbundling
Comments Off on Wayne Moore Makes Suggestions for Legal Aid on “How to Cut Costs Without Cutting Services”
Making Sure Investments In Courts Are Counter-Cyclical
As a general matter, its an article of faith among mainstream economists that government spending is counter-cyclical, that is to say by investing more in government (actually anything) during downturns you cause the money to be re-spent, and re-spent again, … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Justice Generally, Budget Issues, Poverty
Comments Off on Making Sure Investments In Courts Are Counter-Cyclical
ABA Boies-Olsen Report On Court Budgets is Out — Goes Beyond Budget Issues
The David Boies – Theodore Olsen Report is out. This you will recall, is the ABA project on the need to protect the court system during the funding crisis, and is another initiative bringing together these once (and maybe future) … Continue reading
Posted in Budget Issues, Funding, Systematic Change, Technology, Transparency
Tagged ABA, Boies, NCSC, Olsen
1 Comment
Bi-Partisan Support for Senencing Reform and Re-Entry Programs
The ACLU as a nice report out, highlighting how even the more conservative states are embracing sentencing reform as a way of saving money on incarceration. It highlights reforms in Texas, Mississippi, Kansas, South Carolina, Kentucky, and Ohio. The NYT … Continue reading
Posted in Budget Issues, Criminal Law
Tagged Sentencing
Comments Off on Bi-Partisan Support for Senencing Reform and Re-Entry Programs
DOJ Posts List of Funding Resorces for Court LEP Improvements
With the ABA proposed Language Access Standards coming up for ABA approval, it may be worth noting that DOJ has posted a listing of possible funding resources for courts as they move to address LEP issues. The listing is here. … Continue reading
Posted in Budget Issues, Dept. of Justice, Funding, LEP
Comments Off on DOJ Posts List of Funding Resorces for Court LEP Improvements