Full Site Automatic Translation By Google
Notice
Opinions are personal, and only those of the authors themselves. This blog is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice. Copyright reserved 2010-2016.ABA Journal Honoree 2017
-
Join 2,205 other subscribers
Most Recent Comments
Sara Case on Judiciary Committee Democrats… james burdick on Study Showing Greater Racial B… Holly Eaton on Excuses for Not Agreeing to Re… richardzorza on Trump-Olson Retainer and Non-D… Ken Burton on Trump-Olson Retainer and Non-D… -
Most Recent Posts
- Nixon, Trump and the Nexis Between Evil Policy and Core Crimes
- How the Access To Justice Movement is Helping Constrain Trumpism
- Becky Sandefur is a MacArthur!!!
- Judiciary Committee Democrats Should Call the Republican “Assistant” as an Expert Witness on Sex Assault Reporting and Veracity
- Where the Investigation is Headed: Some Propositions
- A Telling Moment
- What a Real Apology Takes
- The Corporate Response to Trump
- Justice Kennedy’s Opinion On “Baking Discrimination” Is Clarion Call for Process Neutrality In The Entire Governmental Sphere
- Study Showing Greater Racial Bias By Republican Judges Has to Shatter Our Assumptions
Posts by Month
Top Posts & Pages
- A Cautionary Tale -- Cartoon Points Out the Downsides of Automated Courts
- Courts are Dysfunctinal for Different Kinds of Litigants in Profoundly Different Ways
- What Does it Mean that DOJ Has Filed a Statement of Interest in NY Right to Quality Counsel Case?
- LSC Access to Justice Technology Summit -- Inspiring Launch of A Process
- Algorithms and Checklists May Help Deal With Implicit Bias
Posts by Category
- 100% Access Strategy and Campaign (56)
- ABA (15)
- Access to Counsel (80)
- Access to Justice Boards (89)
- Access to Justice Generally (340)
- Administative Proecdure (14)
- Alternative Business Structures (4)
- Anti-Trust (8)
- Appellate Practice (5)
- Appreciations (1)
- Artificial Intelligence (2)
- Attorney-Client (24)
- Bail (5)
- Bankruptcy (4)
- Bar Associations (27)
- Bias (2)
- Books (3)
- Budget Issues (35)
- Census Bureau (6)
- Chasm with Communities (17)
- Child Support (12)
- Commentators (3)
- Communications Strategy (29)
- Congress (3)
- Constitution (13)
- Consumer Rights (13)
- Contempt (1)
- Court Fees and Costs (14)
- Court Management (98)
- Criminal Law (36)
- De-Regulation (8)
- Death Penalty (1)
- Debt Collction (3)
- Defender Programs (20)
- Dept. of Justice (64)
- Discrimination (15)
- Document Assembly (50)
- Domestic Violence (16)
- E-filing (7)
- Evictions (7)
- Evidence (2)
- expungement (6)
- Family Law (11)
- Federal Agencies (11)
- Federal Courts (25)
- Foreclosure (27)
- Forms (57)
- Freedom of Expression (3)
- Funding (154)
- Guest Bloggers (9)
- History (5)
- Hospice (1)
- Housing (6)
- Humor (6)
- ILAG (1)
- Immigration (16)
- Incnetives (5)
- Incubators (13)
- International Cooperation (18)
- International Models (27)
- IOLTA (13)
- Judicial Ethics (99)
- Judicial Supremacy (4)
- Justice Index (5)
- LAIR (9)
- Law Schools (63)
- Legal Aid (119)
- Legal Ethics (46)
- Legal Insurance (1)
- LEP (59)
- LGBT (1)
- Libel Law (1)
- Libraries (18)
- Litigant Voice (4)
- Love (3)
- LSC (77)
- Mapping/GIS (5)
- Media (9)
- Mediation (7)
- Medical System Comparision (40)
- Meetings (35)
- Metrics (31)
- Middle Income (29)
- Mixed Model (17)
- Mobile Technology (21)
- Newsmaker Interview (9)
- Non-Lawyer Practice (62)
- Obituaries and Appreciations (1)
- Outcome Measures (33)
- Personal (7)
- Plain Language (11)
- Planning (12)
- Policing (8)
- Political Issues and Justice (2)
- Political Support (16)
- Poverty (19)
- Pro Bono (61)
- Public Defender (12)
- Public Education (4)
- Public Welfare Foundation (5)
- Race (2)
- Reentry (4)
- Referral Systems (7)
- Remote Services (5)
- Research and Evalation (156)
- Rules Reform (16)
- Science (20)
- Security (6)
- Self-Help Services (194)
- Series: Outcome Measures (7)
- Simplification (48)
- Small Claims (1)
- Social Media (1)
- Social Workers (4)
- Software Developers (6)
- SRL Statistics (19)
- SRLN (13)
- State of Judiciary Speeches (3)
- Supreme Court (52)
- Systematic Change (163)
- Tax Policy (3)
- Technology (216)
- This Blog (20)
- Tools (12)
- Transitions (4)
- Transparency (21)
- Triage (73)
- Unbundling (50)
- Uncategorized (10)
- Usabilty (4)
- Veterans (3)
- video (5)
- Vocation (9)
- White House (41)
Cannot load blog information at this time.
RSS and More
Links
- American Judges Association Blog
- ABA Access to Justice Support Center
- Concurrent Opinions Blog
- Court Technology Bulletin Blog
- Dept. of Justice ATJ Initiative
- International Access to Justice Blog (Martin Gramatikov)
- Justice Index
- LawHelp Self-Help Site
- LawyerWatch
- Lewis Kinard’s Unbundling Blog
- Legal Servces Corp
- National Assoc. of IOLTA Programs
- Nationaaal Center for Access to Justice
- National Coalition for a Civil Right to Counsel
- NLADA
- Pro Bono Net
- Pro Bono Net Blog – – Connecting Justice Communities
- SelfHelpSupport Practitioner Site
- Self-Represented Litigation Network
- State Justice Institute
- Technology and Access to Justice Website
- Virtual Law Practice Blog
- Zorza ATJ Site
- Zorza Politics and Humor Blog
- Zorza (Richard) Medical Status Site
- Zorzas Retirement Community
Category Archives: E-filing
Thoughts on the Shriver Study
It is now several months since the California Shriver Pilot Report was issued. The findings and recommendations concerning benefits of counsel have been widely disseminated. (Report announcement summary here) So, I want to here highlight some of the findings that … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Counsel, Access to Justice Generally, Court Management, Document Assembly, E-filing, Legal Aid, Self-Help Services
Comments Off on Thoughts on the Shriver Study
On Waking Up From a Nightmare that was About Trying to E-File in the Supreme Court– Maybe We Can Use the Idea!
I just woke up this morning in a panic from a nightmare that would be funny if it were not so scary. There I am in the dream trying to e-file a pleading with the Supreme Court. Naturally it is … Continue reading
Posted in Document Assembly, E-filing, Supreme Court
Comments Off on On Waking Up From a Nightmare that was About Trying to E-File in the Supreme Court– Maybe We Can Use the Idea!
Answering a Law Professor’s Worry that Free Online Access to Caselaw Will not Help Access to Justice
Brian Sheppard, who teaches at Seton Hall Law School, in an interesting blog post on Bloomberg, raises the question whether the Harvard Law School digitization project I blogged about recently, might not really help access to justice. His worry is … Continue reading
Posted in Document Assembly, E-filing, Libraries, Self-Help Services, Technology
8 Comments
The Power of the Pen and Phone — Exploring Opportunities for Access to Justice in the Next Two Years
Recent executive actions in immigration, and now asset forfeiture underline just how great is the President’s “power of the pen and phone.” — his ability by regulation or other executive action to make very significant changes in the way government … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Justice Generally, Administative Proecdure, Budget Issues, Dept. of Justice, Document Assembly, E-filing, Funding, Law Schools, Non-Lawyer Practice, Veterans, White House
Tagged access to justice, administrative agency, Social Security
Comments Off on The Power of the Pen and Phone — Exploring Opportunities for Access to Justice in the Next Two Years
Texas Chief Justice State of the Judiciary Message
Wallace Jefferson, the inspiring Chief Justice of Texas, has just issued his State of the Judiciary Message. I have bolded the language that might be most useful to quote, but the whole quote, and indeed the whole Message is worthy … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Justice Generally, E-filing, Self-Help Services
Comments Off on Texas Chief Justice State of the Judiciary Message
What Happens When a Federal Court Pays Attention to the Self-Represented — the Central District of California Bankruptcy Court Is A Model for Us All
The Central District of California Bankruptcy Court has released its report on the self-represented. Self-represented, or pro se, litigants comprise over one quarter of the debtors filing in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California. In early … Continue reading
Posted in Bankruptcy, E-filing, Federal Courts, Self-Help Services
2 Comments