Full Site Automatic Translation By Google
Notice
Opinions are personal, and only those of the authors themselves. This blog is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice. Copyright reserved 2010-2016.ABA Journal Honoree 2017

-
Join 903 other subscribers
Most Recent Comments
Sara Case on Judiciary Committee Democrats… james burdick on Study Showing Greater Racial B… Holly Eaton on Excuses for Not Agreeing to Re… richardzorza on Trump-Olson Retainer and Non-D… Ken Burton on Trump-Olson Retainer and Non-D… -
Most Recent Posts
- Nixon, Trump and the Nexis Between Evil Policy and Core Crimes
- How the Access To Justice Movement is Helping Constrain Trumpism
- Becky Sandefur is a MacArthur!!!
- Judiciary Committee Democrats Should Call the Republican “Assistant” as an Expert Witness on Sex Assault Reporting and Veracity
- Where the Investigation is Headed: Some Propositions
- A Telling Moment
- What a Real Apology Takes
- The Corporate Response to Trump
- Justice Kennedy’s Opinion On “Baking Discrimination” Is Clarion Call for Process Neutrality In The Entire Governmental Sphere
- Study Showing Greater Racial Bias By Republican Judges Has to Shatter Our Assumptions
Posts by Month
Top Posts & Pages
- NY Comission on Judicial Conduct Criticizes Judge For Failing to Recognize Need for Interpreter
- A Different Approach to Integrating Litigant Services and Security Screening
- Assessing a Justice for All Strategic Plan
- How Should We Define the Non-Advocacy Services Provided by Courts and Others -- Canda Moves to Expand the Wording
- NewsMaker Interview: Prof. Jim Greiner on the Latest Offer-Outcomes Research and its Implications
- Maybe These Poster Proposals from SRLN Will Stimulate Ideas
- Deregulation of Nonprofit Legal Practice -- An ATJ Breakthrough?
- Study on Legal Service Providers in the UK Operating as Alternative Business Structures
- The Corporate Response to Trump
- Updadates from the Turner Blog
Posts by Category
- 100% Access Strategy and Campaign (56)
- ABA (15)
- Access to Counsel (80)
- Access to Justice Boards (89)
- Access to Justice Generally (340)
- Administative Proecdure (14)
- Alternative Business Structures (4)
- Anti-Trust (8)
- Appellate Practice (5)
- Appreciations (1)
- Artificial Intelligence (2)
- Attorney-Client (24)
- Bail (5)
- Bankruptcy (4)
- Bar Associations (27)
- Bias (2)
- Books (3)
- Budget Issues (35)
- Census Bureau (6)
- Chasm with Communities (17)
- Child Support (12)
- Commentators (3)
- Communications Strategy (29)
- Congress (3)
- Constitution (13)
- Consumer Rights (13)
- Contempt (1)
- Court Fees and Costs (14)
- Court Management (98)
- Criminal Law (36)
- De-Regulation (8)
- Death Penalty (1)
- Debt Collction (3)
- Defender Programs (20)
- Dept. of Justice (64)
- Discrimination (15)
- Document Assembly (50)
- Domestic Violence (16)
- E-filing (7)
- Evictions (7)
- Evidence (2)
- expungement (6)
- Family Law (11)
- Federal Agencies (11)
- Federal Courts (25)
- Foreclosure (27)
- Forms (57)
- Freedom of Expression (3)
- Funding (154)
- Guest Bloggers (9)
- History (5)
- Hospice (1)
- Housing (6)
- Humor (6)
- ILAG (1)
- Immigration (16)
- Incnetives (5)
- Incubators (13)
- International Cooperation (18)
- International Models (27)
- IOLTA (13)
- Judicial Ethics (99)
- Judicial Supremacy (4)
- Justice Index (5)
- LAIR (9)
- Law Schools (63)
- Legal Aid (119)
- Legal Ethics (46)
- Legal Insurance (1)
- LEP (59)
- LGBT (1)
- Libel Law (1)
- Libraries (18)
- Litigant Voice (4)
- Love (3)
- LSC (77)
- Mapping/GIS (5)
- Media (9)
- Mediation (7)
- Medical System Comparision (40)
- Meetings (35)
- Metrics (31)
- Middle Income (29)
- Mixed Model (17)
- Mobile Technology (21)
- Newsmaker Interview (9)
- Non-Lawyer Practice (62)
- Obituaries and Appreciations (1)
- Outcome Measures (33)
- Personal (7)
- Plain Language (11)
- Planning (12)
- Policing (8)
- Political Issues and Justice (2)
- Political Support (16)
- Poverty (19)
- Pro Bono (61)
- Public Defender (12)
- Public Education (4)
- Public Welfare Foundation (5)
- Race (2)
- Reentry (4)
- Referral Systems (7)
- Remote Services (5)
- Research and Evalation (156)
- Rules Reform (16)
- Science (20)
- Security (6)
- Self-Help Services (194)
- Series: Outcome Measures (7)
- Simplification (48)
- Small Claims (1)
- Social Media (1)
- Social Workers (4)
- Software Developers (6)
- SRL Statistics (19)
- SRLN (13)
- State of Judiciary Speeches (3)
- Supreme Court (52)
- Systematic Change (163)
- Tax Policy (3)
- Technology (216)
- This Blog (20)
- Tools (12)
- Transitions (4)
- Transparency (21)
- Triage (73)
- Unbundling (50)
- Uncategorized (10)
- Usabilty (4)
- Veterans (3)
- video (5)
- Vocation (9)
- White House (41)
Cannot load blog information at this time.
RSS and More
Links
- American Judges Association Blog
- ABA Access to Justice Support Center
- Concurrent Opinions Blog
- Court Technology Bulletin Blog
- Dept. of Justice ATJ Initiative
- International Access to Justice Blog (Martin Gramatikov)
- Justice Index
- LawHelp Self-Help Site
- LawyerWatch
- Lewis Kinard’s Unbundling Blog
- Legal Servces Corp
- National Assoc. of IOLTA Programs
- Nationaaal Center for Access to Justice
- National Coalition for a Civil Right to Counsel
- NLADA
- Pro Bono Net
- Pro Bono Net Blog – – Connecting Justice Communities
- SelfHelpSupport Practitioner Site
- Self-Represented Litigation Network
- State Justice Institute
- Technology and Access to Justice Website
- Virtual Law Practice Blog
- Zorza ATJ Site
- Zorza Politics and Humor Blog
- Zorza (Richard) Medical Status Site
- Zorzas Retirement Community
Category Archives: Court Management
Follow-Up Guest Blog on Bronx Family Court Self-Help Center
Bronx Family Court Help Center By Bronx County Family Court Clerk of Court Mike Williams As Richard blogged yesterday, the Bronx County Family opened its new Help Center Complex this week. Our initial goal was to relocate an extremely busy … Continue reading
Posted in Court Management, Self-Help Services
Comments Off on Follow-Up Guest Blog on Bronx Family Court Self-Help Center
September Court Technology Conference to Feauture Self-Represented Track
The 2013 Court Technology Conference, to be held in Baltimore September 17-19, will feature a full track on the use of technology to assist in court access for the self-represented. Session titles and descriptions are: What do Litigants Expect? Two … Continue reading
Posted in Court Management, Meetings, Self-Help Services, Technology
2 Comments
Thoughts on Jury Orientation
I sat through jury orientation and (non) selection yesterday. One observation: While there was frequent mention of attorneys doing things, there was absolutely no mention of the possibility that a litigant might be self-represented. This might have the unintended effect … Continue reading
Posted in Court Management
Comments Off on Thoughts on Jury Orientation
National Law Journal Article on Court Watching in SRL Cases
This is a great model, with the opportunity dramatically to focus attention on the quality of access for the self-represented in the courtroom. A partnership of the National Center for Access to Justice, Pfizer’s Legal Alliance, 15 law firms, and … Continue reading
Posted in Court Management, Judicial Ethics
2 Comments
NCSC Trends Publication Solicits Proposals for Articles
The NCSC publication Court Trends is an important source of information about changes occurring in the state courts. It is now soliciting proposals for articles for its next issue. I would encourage those who want to spread the word about … Continue reading
Posted in Court Management
Comments Off on NCSC Trends Publication Solicits Proposals for Articles
Guest Blogger Magistrate Simon Mole on How Colorado’s Early Experiments with Proactive Case Processing are Fascinating from an ATJ Perspective
John Greacen and Pamela Gagel have reported here on using court-convened initial status conferences for managing domestic relations cases. The status conferences enabled triage and the shepherding of pro se litigants via differential case management. Greacen and Gagel give subtle … Continue reading
Towards a New Accss-Friendly Rules Project
Here is a potentially transformative idea that I raised at the recent Symposium at Harvard Law School on Civil Gideon. Maybe it is time to rethink the Federal Rules Project. Back when the Federal Rules were first being put in … Continue reading
Senate Confirms New SJI Board Member
This is great news. Early in January, the Senate confirmed New York Court of Appeals Judge Jonathan Lippman as a member of the State Justice Institute Board. Readers of this blog do not need to be reminded of CJ Lippman’s … Continue reading
Posted in Court Management, Funding, Systematic Change
Comments Off on Senate Confirms New SJI Board Member
Early Court App for Mobile
As reported in the Law Vegas Review Journal, this court app helps people find out which courtroom their case will be heard in. The application will help users search via party, attorney or case number to find the date, time … Continue reading
Posted in Court Management, Mobile Technology, Technology
2 Comments
Funded Technical Assistance on Access Availalbe to Courts from NCSC Center on Court Acces for All
Funded technical assistance on access to justice is now available to Courts from the NCSC Center on Court Acces for All. This resource could be very helpful. Here is the website for the assistance program. The forms this assistance might … Continue reading
New Access Brief
The Center on Court Access to Justice for All, with which I am affiliated, has just released its second Access Brief, on Forms and Document assembly. Given that this Brief has the imprimatur of the National Center for State Courts, … Continue reading
Posted in Court Management, Document Assembly, Forms, Self-Help Services
Comments Off on New Access Brief
On Linking Practice and Innovation
Today’s New York Times has an interesting article on the advantages of co-locating research and production: [E]xperts say that in industries that produce complex, high-technology products — things like bioengineered tissues, not light bulbs — companies that keep their research … Continue reading
Posted in Court Management, Research and Evalation
Comments Off on On Linking Practice and Innovation
After the Elections — Institutional Implications
I promised some discussion of post-election access to justice institutional implications. Here, somewhat later than I had hoped, it is. Institutional Stability The first point is obvious. The LSC and SJI Boards stay the same, as a practical matter for … Continue reading
Posted in Court Management, Funding, Legal Aid
Comments Off on After the Elections — Institutional Implications
Center for Court Access to Justice for All Issues First Accss Brief on Self-Help Services
This Brief is the first of a series of Access Briefs, developed by the National Center for State Court’s new Center for Court Access to Justice for All. The Brief, like those to follow, is a short summary of the … Continue reading
Posted in Court Management, Self-Help Services
Comments Off on Center for Court Access to Justice for All Issues First Accss Brief on Self-Help Services
Post Election Implications for Access to Justice — Part I: Broad Themes
This very much not an electoral politics blog. But Tuesday had such strong implications for the access to justice discussion that I think it may be useful to start to think through some of the second level themes and implications … Continue reading