Full Site Automatic Translation By Google
Notice
Opinions are personal, and only those of the authors themselves. This blog is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice. Copyright reserved 2010-2016.ABA Journal Honoree 2017

-
Join 903 other subscribers
Most Recent Comments
Sara Case on Judiciary Committee Democrats… james burdick on Study Showing Greater Racial B… Holly Eaton on Excuses for Not Agreeing to Re… richardzorza on Trump-Olson Retainer and Non-D… Ken Burton on Trump-Olson Retainer and Non-D… -
Most Recent Posts
- Nixon, Trump and the Nexis Between Evil Policy and Core Crimes
- How the Access To Justice Movement is Helping Constrain Trumpism
- Becky Sandefur is a MacArthur!!!
- Judiciary Committee Democrats Should Call the Republican “Assistant” as an Expert Witness on Sex Assault Reporting and Veracity
- Where the Investigation is Headed: Some Propositions
- A Telling Moment
- What a Real Apology Takes
- The Corporate Response to Trump
- Justice Kennedy’s Opinion On “Baking Discrimination” Is Clarion Call for Process Neutrality In The Entire Governmental Sphere
- Study Showing Greater Racial Bias By Republican Judges Has to Shatter Our Assumptions
Posts by Month
Top Posts & Pages
- Maybe These Poster Proposals from SRLN Will Stimulate Ideas
- NYT Report on California "Court-Aided Divorce" is a Milestone in Several Ways
- Deregulation of Nonprofit Legal Practice -- An ATJ Breakthrough?
- Study on Legal Service Providers in the UK Operating as Alternative Business Structures
- The Corporate Response to Trump
- NewsMaker Interview: Prof. Jim Greiner on the Latest Offer-Outcomes Research and its Implications
- Nonlawyer Courtroom Navigator Follow-Up -- Initial NY Report shows Value and Impact
- Updadates from the Turner Blog
- Thoughts on the Shriver Study
- Hitler's Children is a Magnificent Film About Getting Beyond Your Backgroud
Posts by Category
- 100% Access Strategy and Campaign (56)
- ABA (15)
- Access to Counsel (80)
- Access to Justice Boards (89)
- Access to Justice Generally (340)
- Administative Proecdure (14)
- Alternative Business Structures (4)
- Anti-Trust (8)
- Appellate Practice (5)
- Appreciations (1)
- Artificial Intelligence (2)
- Attorney-Client (24)
- Bail (5)
- Bankruptcy (4)
- Bar Associations (27)
- Bias (2)
- Books (3)
- Budget Issues (35)
- Census Bureau (6)
- Chasm with Communities (17)
- Child Support (12)
- Commentators (3)
- Communications Strategy (29)
- Congress (3)
- Constitution (13)
- Consumer Rights (13)
- Contempt (1)
- Court Fees and Costs (14)
- Court Management (98)
- Criminal Law (36)
- De-Regulation (8)
- Death Penalty (1)
- Debt Collction (3)
- Defender Programs (20)
- Dept. of Justice (64)
- Discrimination (15)
- Document Assembly (50)
- Domestic Violence (16)
- E-filing (7)
- Evictions (7)
- Evidence (2)
- expungement (6)
- Family Law (11)
- Federal Agencies (11)
- Federal Courts (25)
- Foreclosure (27)
- Forms (57)
- Freedom of Expression (3)
- Funding (154)
- Guest Bloggers (9)
- History (5)
- Hospice (1)
- Housing (6)
- Humor (6)
- ILAG (1)
- Immigration (16)
- Incnetives (5)
- Incubators (13)
- International Cooperation (18)
- International Models (27)
- IOLTA (13)
- Judicial Ethics (99)
- Judicial Supremacy (4)
- Justice Index (5)
- LAIR (9)
- Law Schools (63)
- Legal Aid (119)
- Legal Ethics (46)
- Legal Insurance (1)
- LEP (59)
- LGBT (1)
- Libel Law (1)
- Libraries (18)
- Litigant Voice (4)
- Love (3)
- LSC (77)
- Mapping/GIS (5)
- Media (9)
- Mediation (7)
- Medical System Comparision (40)
- Meetings (35)
- Metrics (31)
- Middle Income (29)
- Mixed Model (17)
- Mobile Technology (21)
- Newsmaker Interview (9)
- Non-Lawyer Practice (62)
- Obituaries and Appreciations (1)
- Outcome Measures (33)
- Personal (7)
- Plain Language (11)
- Planning (12)
- Policing (8)
- Political Issues and Justice (2)
- Political Support (16)
- Poverty (19)
- Pro Bono (61)
- Public Defender (12)
- Public Education (4)
- Public Welfare Foundation (5)
- Race (2)
- Reentry (4)
- Referral Systems (7)
- Remote Services (5)
- Research and Evalation (156)
- Rules Reform (16)
- Science (20)
- Security (6)
- Self-Help Services (194)
- Series: Outcome Measures (7)
- Simplification (48)
- Small Claims (1)
- Social Media (1)
- Social Workers (4)
- Software Developers (6)
- SRL Statistics (19)
- SRLN (13)
- State of Judiciary Speeches (3)
- Supreme Court (52)
- Systematic Change (163)
- Tax Policy (3)
- Technology (216)
- This Blog (20)
- Tools (12)
- Transitions (4)
- Transparency (21)
- Triage (73)
- Unbundling (50)
- Uncategorized (10)
- Usabilty (4)
- Veterans (3)
- video (5)
- Vocation (9)
- White House (41)
Cannot load blog information at this time.
RSS and More
Links
- American Judges Association Blog
- ABA Access to Justice Support Center
- Concurrent Opinions Blog
- Court Technology Bulletin Blog
- Dept. of Justice ATJ Initiative
- International Access to Justice Blog (Martin Gramatikov)
- Justice Index
- LawHelp Self-Help Site
- LawyerWatch
- Lewis Kinard’s Unbundling Blog
- Legal Servces Corp
- National Assoc. of IOLTA Programs
- Nationaaal Center for Access to Justice
- National Coalition for a Civil Right to Counsel
- NLADA
- Pro Bono Net
- Pro Bono Net Blog – – Connecting Justice Communities
- SelfHelpSupport Practitioner Site
- Self-Represented Litigation Network
- State Justice Institute
- Technology and Access to Justice Website
- Virtual Law Practice Blog
- Zorza ATJ Site
- Zorza Politics and Humor Blog
- Zorza (Richard) Medical Status Site
- Zorzas Retirement Community
Category Archives: Court Management
How Should We Define the Non-Advocacy Services Provided by Courts and Others — Canda Moves to Expand the Wording
While there is broad agreement that there should be a clear verbal distinction between he adversarial/advocacy services provided by lawyers, and the neutral services provided by courts and others to assist litigants navigate the system, there is less complete agreement … Continue reading
Posted in Court Management, Self-Help Services
Comments Off on How Should We Define the Non-Advocacy Services Provided by Courts and Others — Canda Moves to Expand the Wording
Call for Submissions for “Future Trends in State Courts”
The National Center for State Courts has put out a Call for Submissions for its Future Trends in State Courts publication. This book (which is also available online) is widely read and influential in the court world. It has often … Continue reading
Posted in Court Management
Comments Off on Call for Submissions for “Future Trends in State Courts”
NCSC Launches New Court Access Center
Here is the announcement: New Court Access Center The Center on Court Access to Justice for All (Access Center), an initiative of the National Center for State Courts (NCSC), helps judges and courts advance access to justice, especially for poor … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Justice Generally, Court Management, Self-Help Services
Comments Off on NCSC Launches New Court Access Center
The Age/Innovation Conundrum and Implications for Access to Justice
A fascinating post several months ago in the New York Times Economix blog, Getting More Liberal With Age, deals with the age-old conundrum as to whether people really become more conservative as they get older. In contrast to received wisdom: A … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Justice Generally, Court Management, Legal Aid
Comments Off on The Age/Innovation Conundrum and Implications for Access to Justice
Request for Examples of Courts Providing Information on Legal Aid and Access to Counsel Services
Jim Greiner at Harvard (the prof who did the randomized studies in Massachusetts) is trying to find samples of courts who attach notices or flyers to summonses or other early-in-the-litigation-type papers that say something to the effect of, “If you … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Counsel, Court Management
2 Comments
Impact on Funding of Planning Participation
I recently blogged about changes in the Byrne Grant Program, and the potential from changes in the strategic planning language. Now, here’s some evidence that participation in the strategic planning process might impact funding outcomes. As the GAO reports on … Continue reading
Posted in Court Management, Defender Programs, Funding
Comments Off on Impact on Funding of Planning Participation
Changes in Byrne Grant Program Create New Openings for Defenders and Courts
The 2012 solicitation time for Byrne Grants is over (link here.) But I think it is important to highlight some very significant changes, which, given the inertia built into government systems, are likely to stay in place, and to provide … Continue reading
Posted in Court Management, Defender Programs, Dept. of Justice, Funding
2 Comments
LSC Access to Justice Technology Summit — Inspiring Launch of A Process
The first part of the LSC Summit on Technology and Access to Justice took place last week. I think it is appropriate for me to pass on to the community some very personal and impressionistic non-specific highlights. First, it was … Continue reading
Posted in Court Management, Dept. of Justice, LSC, Systematic Change, Technology
5 Comments
NCSC Court Trends 2012 Online — Article on Turner v Rogers and Due Process
The NCSC publication Future Trend in State Courts 2012, is now up on their website. From the preface by Mary McQueen: This year’s edition of the National Center for State Courts’ Future Trends in State Courts series focuses on “Courts … Continue reading
Posted in Court Management, Funding
Comments Off on NCSC Court Trends 2012 Online — Article on Turner v Rogers and Due Process
Carl Reynolds Retires from Texas Administrative Office of Courts
Carl Reynolds, Director of the Texas Administrative Office of the Courts, is retiring. Here is his biography, as distributed at the January 2012 Shared Solutions Summit: Carl Reynolds is an attorney with extensive experience in all three branches of Texas … Continue reading
Posted in Court Management
Tagged Texas
Comments Off on Carl Reynolds Retires from Texas Administrative Office of Courts
A New Cut at Triage Principles
A few weeks ago, I bogged on some principles for triage that had come out of a meeting at the TIG conference. Since then I have elaborated and expanded them, including expanded their scope to include triage conducted to determine … Continue reading
Posted in Court Management, Technology, Transparency, Triage
3 Comments
High Performance Courts
One approach the National Center has been taking to improve the functioning of courts nationally is to focus on overall strategies for achieving “high performance.” There are seven such strategies, highlighted here in an article by Judge Kevin Burke, Brian … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Justice Generally, Court Management
1 Comment
New York Access Group Keeps on Moving
This should inspire us all. As you know, the NY courts have had a brutal budget year. Yet they have just issued their 2011 Access Report, showing some great new innovations: The creation of a trilingual DIY (document assembly) form … Continue reading
Posted in Court Management, Document Assembly, Self-Help Services
Tagged Faecebook, NY, Twitter
Comments Off on New York Access Group Keeps on Moving
California Daily Journal on Costs of Cutting Self-Help Programs
The (California) Daily Journal, a legal publication, has a good story on the risk that cutting back on self-help services may end up costing more than it saves. A good article to cite to. Just a few years ago, California … Continue reading
Posted in Budget Issues, Court Management, Research and Evalation, Self-Help Services
Tagged California
Comments Off on California Daily Journal on Costs of Cutting Self-Help Programs
Democratization of Decision-Making — Implications for Access to Justice Institutions
Tom Friedman in the NY Times, argues that both both companies and counties, the old top down decision-making and leadership systems are obsolete. The main driver, I believe, is the merger of globalization and the Information Technology revolution. Both of … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Justice Boards, Court Management, Dept. of Justice, Technology, Transparency
Comments Off on Democratization of Decision-Making — Implications for Access to Justice Institutions