Full Site Automatic Translation By Google
Notice
Opinions are personal, and only those of the authors themselves. This blog is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice. Copyright reserved 2010-2016.ABA Journal Honoree 2017

-
Join 903 other subscribers
Most Recent Comments
Sara Case on Judiciary Committee Democrats… james burdick on Study Showing Greater Racial B… Holly Eaton on Excuses for Not Agreeing to Re… richardzorza on Trump-Olson Retainer and Non-D… Ken Burton on Trump-Olson Retainer and Non-D… -
Most Recent Posts
- Nixon, Trump and the Nexis Between Evil Policy and Core Crimes
- How the Access To Justice Movement is Helping Constrain Trumpism
- Becky Sandefur is a MacArthur!!!
- Judiciary Committee Democrats Should Call the Republican “Assistant” as an Expert Witness on Sex Assault Reporting and Veracity
- Where the Investigation is Headed: Some Propositions
- A Telling Moment
- What a Real Apology Takes
- The Corporate Response to Trump
- Justice Kennedy’s Opinion On “Baking Discrimination” Is Clarion Call for Process Neutrality In The Entire Governmental Sphere
- Study Showing Greater Racial Bias By Republican Judges Has to Shatter Our Assumptions
Posts by Month
Top Posts & Pages
- NewsMaker Interview: Prof. Jim Greiner on the Latest Offer-Outcomes Research and its Implications
- Maybe These Poster Proposals from SRLN Will Stimulate Ideas
- Deregulation of Nonprofit Legal Practice -- An ATJ Breakthrough?
- Study on Legal Service Providers in the UK Operating as Alternative Business Structures
- The Corporate Response to Trump
- Updadates from the Turner Blog
- Nonlawyer Courtroom Navigator Follow-Up -- Initial NY Report shows Value and Impact
- Thoughts on the Shriver Study
- Hitler's Children is a Magnificent Film About Getting Beyond Your Backgroud
- A New Way of Thinking About Triage, 100% Access, and the Analysis Process
Posts by Category
- 100% Access Strategy and Campaign (56)
- ABA (15)
- Access to Counsel (80)
- Access to Justice Boards (89)
- Access to Justice Generally (340)
- Administative Proecdure (14)
- Alternative Business Structures (4)
- Anti-Trust (8)
- Appellate Practice (5)
- Appreciations (1)
- Artificial Intelligence (2)
- Attorney-Client (24)
- Bail (5)
- Bankruptcy (4)
- Bar Associations (27)
- Bias (2)
- Books (3)
- Budget Issues (35)
- Census Bureau (6)
- Chasm with Communities (17)
- Child Support (12)
- Commentators (3)
- Communications Strategy (29)
- Congress (3)
- Constitution (13)
- Consumer Rights (13)
- Contempt (1)
- Court Fees and Costs (14)
- Court Management (98)
- Criminal Law (36)
- De-Regulation (8)
- Death Penalty (1)
- Debt Collction (3)
- Defender Programs (20)
- Dept. of Justice (64)
- Discrimination (15)
- Document Assembly (50)
- Domestic Violence (16)
- E-filing (7)
- Evictions (7)
- Evidence (2)
- expungement (6)
- Family Law (11)
- Federal Agencies (11)
- Federal Courts (25)
- Foreclosure (27)
- Forms (57)
- Freedom of Expression (3)
- Funding (154)
- Guest Bloggers (9)
- History (5)
- Hospice (1)
- Housing (6)
- Humor (6)
- ILAG (1)
- Immigration (16)
- Incnetives (5)
- Incubators (13)
- International Cooperation (18)
- International Models (27)
- IOLTA (13)
- Judicial Ethics (99)
- Judicial Supremacy (4)
- Justice Index (5)
- LAIR (9)
- Law Schools (63)
- Legal Aid (119)
- Legal Ethics (46)
- Legal Insurance (1)
- LEP (59)
- LGBT (1)
- Libel Law (1)
- Libraries (18)
- Litigant Voice (4)
- Love (3)
- LSC (77)
- Mapping/GIS (5)
- Media (9)
- Mediation (7)
- Medical System Comparision (40)
- Meetings (35)
- Metrics (31)
- Middle Income (29)
- Mixed Model (17)
- Mobile Technology (21)
- Newsmaker Interview (9)
- Non-Lawyer Practice (62)
- Obituaries and Appreciations (1)
- Outcome Measures (33)
- Personal (7)
- Plain Language (11)
- Planning (12)
- Policing (8)
- Political Issues and Justice (2)
- Political Support (16)
- Poverty (19)
- Pro Bono (61)
- Public Defender (12)
- Public Education (4)
- Public Welfare Foundation (5)
- Race (2)
- Reentry (4)
- Referral Systems (7)
- Remote Services (5)
- Research and Evalation (156)
- Rules Reform (16)
- Science (20)
- Security (6)
- Self-Help Services (194)
- Series: Outcome Measures (7)
- Simplification (48)
- Small Claims (1)
- Social Media (1)
- Social Workers (4)
- Software Developers (6)
- SRL Statistics (19)
- SRLN (13)
- State of Judiciary Speeches (3)
- Supreme Court (52)
- Systematic Change (163)
- Tax Policy (3)
- Technology (216)
- This Blog (20)
- Tools (12)
- Transitions (4)
- Transparency (21)
- Triage (73)
- Unbundling (50)
- Uncategorized (10)
- Usabilty (4)
- Veterans (3)
- video (5)
- Vocation (9)
- White House (41)
Cannot load blog information at this time.
RSS and More
Links
- American Judges Association Blog
- ABA Access to Justice Support Center
- Concurrent Opinions Blog
- Court Technology Bulletin Blog
- Dept. of Justice ATJ Initiative
- International Access to Justice Blog (Martin Gramatikov)
- Justice Index
- LawHelp Self-Help Site
- LawyerWatch
- Lewis Kinard’s Unbundling Blog
- Legal Servces Corp
- National Assoc. of IOLTA Programs
- Nationaaal Center for Access to Justice
- National Coalition for a Civil Right to Counsel
- NLADA
- Pro Bono Net
- Pro Bono Net Blog – – Connecting Justice Communities
- SelfHelpSupport Practitioner Site
- Self-Represented Litigation Network
- State Justice Institute
- Technology and Access to Justice Website
- Virtual Law Practice Blog
- Zorza ATJ Site
- Zorza Politics and Humor Blog
- Zorza (Richard) Medical Status Site
- Zorzas Retirement Community
Category Archives: Judicial Ethics
NYT Piece on Doctor “Mindfulness” has Major Implications for Lawyers and Judges
A fascinating article in the New York Times focuses on doctor “mindfulness” suggests how helpful it is to train professionals on how to clear their minds so that they can focus on the person and situation in front of them. … Continue reading
Posted in Judicial Ethics
Comments Off on NYT Piece on Doctor “Mindfulness” has Major Implications for Lawyers and Judges
First Modules Of Updated Judicial Curriculum Launched and Posted
Yesterday at the meeting of the National Association of State Judicial Educators, we launched the first new modules of the updated Judicial Curriculum on Self-Represented Litigation. These have been developed by the the NCSC Center on Court Access for All, … Continue reading
Posted in Judicial Ethics
Comments Off on First Modules Of Updated Judicial Curriculum Launched and Posted
National Law Journal Article on Court Watching in SRL Cases
This is a great model, with the opportunity dramatically to focus attention on the quality of access for the self-represented in the courtroom. A partnership of the National Center for Access to Justice, Pfizer’s Legal Alliance, 15 law firms, and … Continue reading
Posted in Court Management, Judicial Ethics
2 Comments
SRLN Memo on Options for State Codes of Judicial Conduct
Last year, the Conference of Chief Justices and COSCA passed a joint resolution urging consideration of alternative model langague for Rule 2.2 of the Model Code of Judicial Conduct, with an expanded focus on the self-represented. The resolution also urged … Continue reading
Posted in Judicial Ethics
7 Comments
Jim Greiner Asks For Help with SRL Courtroom Scripts
Harvard’s Jim Greiner, randomized study guru, asks for help identifying model self-represented litigant courtroom scripts. Specifically, he is working on a project in which litigants would be given written scripts that they could use orally in court to help them … Continue reading
American Judges Association Adopts White Paper on Implications of Science for Judging
This White Paper, MINDING THE COURT, should be read by all judges and those who appear in front of, or talk to (professionally or personally), judges. It focuses on the lessons of recent neuroscience and their implications for fair and … Continue reading
Posted in Judicial Ethics, Science
Comments Off on American Judges Association Adopts White Paper on Implications of Science for Judging
West Wing Revisited — Cast Shoots Ad in Support of Voting on Non-Partisan Judicial Elections — and One Particular Michigan Supreme Court Candidate
This is pretty newsworthy, regardless of who you might support in a judicial election. The West Wing cast reunites to shoot an ad (here — just shown on the MS-NBC program “The Last Word)” in support of the idea that … Continue reading
Posted in Judicial Ethics
1 Comment
A Step Forward: New York Times Endorses Judicial Candidate Based on Experience with the Self-Represented
Its nice to see, and good news for the self-represented, regardless of the merits (on which this blog is not here commenting). The Gray Lady endorsing a judicial candidate based on experience dealing with the self-represented. CIVIL COURT, THE BRONX, … Continue reading
Posted in Judicial Ethics, Self-Help Services
1 Comment
Major News from CCJ/COSCA on Model Code of Judicial Conduct and the Self-Represented
In a move that has the potential for major impact on self-represented litigants in the courtroom nationally, the Conference of Chief Justices and the Conference of State Court Administrators have passed a Resolution recommending that states consider passing versions of … Continue reading
Teaching Doctors Empahty — Some Lessons and Questions for the Legal System
The Economix blog in the New York Times has a great post on new research that shows that doctors can be taught empathy. In the experiment: Dr. Helen Riess, director of the Empathy and Relational Science Program in the department … Continue reading
Posted in Judicial Ethics, Medical System Comparision, Research and Evalation, Science
Comments Off on Teaching Doctors Empahty — Some Lessons and Questions for the Legal System
Court Watching Pays Real Dividends
Eight months ago, I blogged about a promising domestic violence court watching project in Montgomery County MD. Turns out the project has been a great success: “We’re very excited. Clearly there have been dramatic changes, and we are pleased with … Continue reading
Posted in Domestic Violence, Judicial Ethics
Tagged Court Watching
Comments Off on Court Watching Pays Real Dividends
On Preventing Unconscious Judicial Bias — a Model Personal Approach
Thoughtful judges recognize the inherent risk of unconscious bias, and the difficulty of preventing it. A wonderful article based on an interview with Federal District Court Judge Ricardo Urbina lays out his approach to sentencing, and perhaps even more important, … Continue reading
Department of Justice and Office of Child Support (HHS) Anounce Webcast Forum on Turner v. Rogers on June 20
I am proud that I will be part of a live and streamed Forum on Turner, on its first anniversary. Here is the announcement: Turner v. Rogers Anniversary Forum: Fundamental Fairness and the Ability to Pay in Child Support Proceedings … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Counsel, Dept. of Justice, Judicial Ethics, Self-Help Services
Tagged HHS, OSCE
Comments Off on Department of Justice and Office of Child Support (HHS) Anounce Webcast Forum on Turner v. Rogers on June 20
Setting Public Goals for Access Commissions: The Massachusetts Model
Kudos to the Massachusetts ATJ Commission for publicly setting itself objectives that are both concrete and ambitious — and for assigning groups and individuals to be responsible for moving them forward. I am particularly impressed that goals for working with … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Justice Boards, Funding, Judicial Ethics, Legal Aid, Legal Ethics, Self-Help Services, Technology, Transparency
Comments Off on Setting Public Goals for Access Commissions: The Massachusetts Model
Montana Supreme Court Takes Lead on SRL Discovery Issues
The pitfalls of discovery procedure are one of the barriers to access for the self-represented. So it is particularly good to see the Montana Supreme Court taking a commonsense approach to the technicalities. In Arlington v. Miller’s Trucking, the Court … Continue reading
Posted in Administative Proecdure, Judicial Ethics
Tagged Discovery
Comments Off on Montana Supreme Court Takes Lead on SRL Discovery Issues