Full Site Automatic Translation By Google
Notice
Opinions are personal, and only those of the authors themselves. This blog is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice. Copyright reserved 2010-2016.ABA Journal Honoree 2017

-
Join 903 other subscribers
Most Recent Comments
Sara Case on Judiciary Committee Democrats… james burdick on Study Showing Greater Racial B… Holly Eaton on Excuses for Not Agreeing to Re… richardzorza on Trump-Olson Retainer and Non-D… Ken Burton on Trump-Olson Retainer and Non-D… -
Most Recent Posts
- Nixon, Trump and the Nexis Between Evil Policy and Core Crimes
- How the Access To Justice Movement is Helping Constrain Trumpism
- Becky Sandefur is a MacArthur!!!
- Judiciary Committee Democrats Should Call the Republican “Assistant” as an Expert Witness on Sex Assault Reporting and Veracity
- Where the Investigation is Headed: Some Propositions
- A Telling Moment
- What a Real Apology Takes
- The Corporate Response to Trump
- Justice Kennedy’s Opinion On “Baking Discrimination” Is Clarion Call for Process Neutrality In The Entire Governmental Sphere
- Study Showing Greater Racial Bias By Republican Judges Has to Shatter Our Assumptions
Posts by Month
Top Posts & Pages
Posts by Category
- 100% Access Strategy and Campaign (56)
- ABA (15)
- Access to Counsel (80)
- Access to Justice Boards (89)
- Access to Justice Generally (340)
- Administative Proecdure (14)
- Alternative Business Structures (4)
- Anti-Trust (8)
- Appellate Practice (5)
- Appreciations (1)
- Artificial Intelligence (2)
- Attorney-Client (24)
- Bail (5)
- Bankruptcy (4)
- Bar Associations (27)
- Bias (2)
- Books (3)
- Budget Issues (35)
- Census Bureau (6)
- Chasm with Communities (17)
- Child Support (12)
- Commentators (3)
- Communications Strategy (29)
- Congress (3)
- Constitution (13)
- Consumer Rights (13)
- Contempt (1)
- Court Fees and Costs (14)
- Court Management (98)
- Criminal Law (36)
- De-Regulation (8)
- Death Penalty (1)
- Debt Collction (3)
- Defender Programs (20)
- Dept. of Justice (64)
- Discrimination (15)
- Document Assembly (50)
- Domestic Violence (16)
- E-filing (7)
- Evictions (7)
- Evidence (2)
- expungement (6)
- Family Law (11)
- Federal Agencies (11)
- Federal Courts (25)
- Foreclosure (27)
- Forms (57)
- Freedom of Expression (3)
- Funding (154)
- Guest Bloggers (9)
- History (5)
- Hospice (1)
- Housing (6)
- Humor (6)
- ILAG (1)
- Immigration (16)
- Incnetives (5)
- Incubators (13)
- International Cooperation (18)
- International Models (27)
- IOLTA (13)
- Judicial Ethics (99)
- Judicial Supremacy (4)
- Justice Index (5)
- LAIR (9)
- Law Schools (63)
- Legal Aid (119)
- Legal Ethics (46)
- Legal Insurance (1)
- LEP (59)
- LGBT (1)
- Libel Law (1)
- Libraries (18)
- Litigant Voice (4)
- Love (3)
- LSC (77)
- Mapping/GIS (5)
- Media (9)
- Mediation (7)
- Medical System Comparision (40)
- Meetings (35)
- Metrics (31)
- Middle Income (29)
- Mixed Model (17)
- Mobile Technology (21)
- Newsmaker Interview (9)
- Non-Lawyer Practice (62)
- Obituaries and Appreciations (1)
- Outcome Measures (33)
- Personal (7)
- Plain Language (11)
- Planning (12)
- Policing (8)
- Political Issues and Justice (2)
- Political Support (16)
- Poverty (19)
- Pro Bono (61)
- Public Defender (12)
- Public Education (4)
- Public Welfare Foundation (5)
- Race (2)
- Reentry (4)
- Referral Systems (7)
- Remote Services (5)
- Research and Evalation (156)
- Rules Reform (16)
- Science (20)
- Security (6)
- Self-Help Services (194)
- Series: Outcome Measures (7)
- Simplification (48)
- Small Claims (1)
- Social Media (1)
- Social Workers (4)
- Software Developers (6)
- SRL Statistics (19)
- SRLN (13)
- State of Judiciary Speeches (3)
- Supreme Court (52)
- Systematic Change (163)
- Tax Policy (3)
- Technology (216)
- This Blog (20)
- Tools (12)
- Transitions (4)
- Transparency (21)
- Triage (73)
- Unbundling (50)
- Uncategorized (10)
- Usabilty (4)
- Veterans (3)
- video (5)
- Vocation (9)
- White House (41)
Cannot load blog information at this time.
RSS and More
Links
- American Judges Association Blog
- ABA Access to Justice Support Center
- Concurrent Opinions Blog
- Court Technology Bulletin Blog
- Dept. of Justice ATJ Initiative
- International Access to Justice Blog (Martin Gramatikov)
- Justice Index
- LawHelp Self-Help Site
- LawyerWatch
- Lewis Kinard’s Unbundling Blog
- Legal Servces Corp
- National Assoc. of IOLTA Programs
- Nationaaal Center for Access to Justice
- National Coalition for a Civil Right to Counsel
- NLADA
- Pro Bono Net
- Pro Bono Net Blog – – Connecting Justice Communities
- SelfHelpSupport Practitioner Site
- Self-Represented Litigation Network
- State Justice Institute
- Technology and Access to Justice Website
- Virtual Law Practice Blog
- Zorza ATJ Site
- Zorza Politics and Humor Blog
- Zorza (Richard) Medical Status Site
- Zorzas Retirement Community
Category Archives: Simplification
Could We Get to 100% Access Without As Many New Resources As We Now Assume, a Very Rough Analysis?
It’s a truism and an article of faith in the access to justice community that the only way to get to 100% access to justice is a massive infusion of money. It might well be true, but try this mental … Continue reading
What Might “Access to Justice Sullivan Principles” Look Like?
I recently blogged about the idea of access to justice “Sullivan Principles”. As man will remember, the Sullivan Principles were a set of principles for corporations about dealing with the old apartheid regime in South Africa. While some criticized these … Continue reading
Posted in Consumer Rights, Funding, Rules Reform, Simplification
Comments Off on What Might “Access to Justice Sullivan Principles” Look Like?
The Pope Joins the Simplification Movement
In the slow-moving Vatican bureaucracy, it’s big news, as reported in the Washington Post, when the annulment procedures are made easier. Or, as Katherine Alteneder put it: “The Pope joins the simplification movement.” Specifically: The changes will eliminate a requirement … Continue reading
Posted in Document Assembly, Simplification, Systematic Change
Comments Off on The Pope Joins the Simplification Movement
LSC’s Jim Sandman Interview Shows Pace of Change in Access to Justice
A recent interview that LSC’s Jim Sandman gave to Bloomberg/BDA underlines how fast things are changing in access to justice. Among the nuggets: Among the reasons Jim gives for the access crisis is “A regulatory system that stultifies innovation and … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Justice Boards, Access to Justice Generally, Legal Aid, LSC, Non-Lawyer Practice, Simplification, Systematic Change, Technology
Comments Off on LSC’s Jim Sandman Interview Shows Pace of Change in Access to Justice
ATJ Commissions Planning Survey Shows Energy, Common Directions and Interest in Multi-State Networking
After the Access to Justice Commissions meeting this spring in Austin, the Commissions were invited to respond to a brief survey as to their interest in following up on the areas for possible initiatives that had been the focus of … Continue reading
How State-Wide Groups Might Help Deal With The “Ferguson Chasm”
Here are some suggestions for how ATJ Commissions and other statewide groups (or those just advocating) might move forward on addressing the “Ferguson Chasm” — the gap between communities and the entire legal system, epitomized by Ferguson using the court … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Justice Boards, Chasm with Communities, Child Support, Court Fees and Costs, Policing, Self-Help Services, Simplification
Comments Off on How State-Wide Groups Might Help Deal With The “Ferguson Chasm”
Colorado Civil Access Pilot Project Highlights Potential of Simplifcation
The October E-SJI News includes an article on the report by the Institute for the Advancement of the American Legal System (IAALS) on the Colorado Civil Access Pilot. The core idea of the project which is focused on business cases, … Continue reading
Posted in Court Management, Rules Reform, Simplification
Comments Off on Colorado Civil Access Pilot Project Highlights Potential of Simplifcation
Courts are Dysfunctinal for Different Kinds of Litigants in Profoundly Different Ways
It seems to me that the discussions about how to make courts work again have suffered from a problem of fragmentation. While basically all courts operate under the same rules, based on the 1930’s Federal Rule project, there are now … Continue reading
Posted in Federal Courts, Foreclosure, Rules Reform, Simplification, Systematic Change
Comments Off on Courts are Dysfunctinal for Different Kinds of Litigants in Profoundly Different Ways
Very Important Communications Research Released
This is one of the most important posts I have ever written. I am honored to be authorized to post the communications research conducted by Lake Research Partners and the Torrance Group on civil legal aid and access to justice … Continue reading
Richard Posner’s New Book Addresses Sources of Complexity in the Law
I have to admit that I am responding to the New York Times review of Posner’s new book, not the book itself. But I was fascinated by this distinction from the review. At the outset, Posner distinguishes between two kinds … Continue reading
Posted in Simplification
2 Comments
More on the “Until Gideon” Symposium at Fordham
At the Symposium, Earl Johnston presented on the concept of Civil Gideon, and I was one of the two responders. As part of this presentation (and by e-mail before the meeting) he had presented some questions that he suggested would … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Counsel, Judicial Ethics, Self-Help Services, Simplification, Triage
Tagged legal principles
2 Comments
English/Welsh Judges Issue SRL Handbook From Which the US Might Learn
A Committee of English and Welsh Judges have put together a handbook for what they call Litigants In Person, and we call the self-represented. While the document has received some criticism, there are some elements that might be useful for … Continue reading
Posted in Simplification
Comments Off on English/Welsh Judges Issue SRL Handbook From Which the US Might Learn
Reflections on Two Comments on 100% Access to Justice Definition
The proposed definition of 100% access to justice has received near record comments — and hopefully there will be more. I want to comment on two here, although all are worth consideration and debate. Jim Greiner points out that the … Continue reading →