Full Site Automatic Translation By Google
Notice
Opinions are personal, and only those of the authors themselves. This blog is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice. Copyright reserved 2010-2016.ABA Journal Honoree 2017

-
Join 903 other subscribers
Most Recent Comments
Sara Case on Judiciary Committee Democrats… james burdick on Study Showing Greater Racial B… Holly Eaton on Excuses for Not Agreeing to Re… richardzorza on Trump-Olson Retainer and Non-D… Ken Burton on Trump-Olson Retainer and Non-D… -
Most Recent Posts
- Nixon, Trump and the Nexis Between Evil Policy and Core Crimes
- How the Access To Justice Movement is Helping Constrain Trumpism
- Becky Sandefur is a MacArthur!!!
- Judiciary Committee Democrats Should Call the Republican “Assistant” as an Expert Witness on Sex Assault Reporting and Veracity
- Where the Investigation is Headed: Some Propositions
- A Telling Moment
- What a Real Apology Takes
- The Corporate Response to Trump
- Justice Kennedy’s Opinion On “Baking Discrimination” Is Clarion Call for Process Neutrality In The Entire Governmental Sphere
- Study Showing Greater Racial Bias By Republican Judges Has to Shatter Our Assumptions
Posts by Month
Top Posts & Pages
- NY Comission on Judicial Conduct Criticizes Judge For Failing to Recognize Need for Interpreter
- A Different Approach to Integrating Litigant Services and Security Screening
- Assessing a Justice for All Strategic Plan
- How Should We Define the Non-Advocacy Services Provided by Courts and Others -- Canda Moves to Expand the Wording
- NewsMaker Interview: Prof. Jim Greiner on the Latest Offer-Outcomes Research and its Implications
- Maybe These Poster Proposals from SRLN Will Stimulate Ideas
- Deregulation of Nonprofit Legal Practice -- An ATJ Breakthrough?
- Study on Legal Service Providers in the UK Operating as Alternative Business Structures
- The Corporate Response to Trump
- Updadates from the Turner Blog
Posts by Category
- 100% Access Strategy and Campaign (56)
- ABA (15)
- Access to Counsel (80)
- Access to Justice Boards (89)
- Access to Justice Generally (340)
- Administative Proecdure (14)
- Alternative Business Structures (4)
- Anti-Trust (8)
- Appellate Practice (5)
- Appreciations (1)
- Artificial Intelligence (2)
- Attorney-Client (24)
- Bail (5)
- Bankruptcy (4)
- Bar Associations (27)
- Bias (2)
- Books (3)
- Budget Issues (35)
- Census Bureau (6)
- Chasm with Communities (17)
- Child Support (12)
- Commentators (3)
- Communications Strategy (29)
- Congress (3)
- Constitution (13)
- Consumer Rights (13)
- Contempt (1)
- Court Fees and Costs (14)
- Court Management (98)
- Criminal Law (36)
- De-Regulation (8)
- Death Penalty (1)
- Debt Collction (3)
- Defender Programs (20)
- Dept. of Justice (64)
- Discrimination (15)
- Document Assembly (50)
- Domestic Violence (16)
- E-filing (7)
- Evictions (7)
- Evidence (2)
- expungement (6)
- Family Law (11)
- Federal Agencies (11)
- Federal Courts (25)
- Foreclosure (27)
- Forms (57)
- Freedom of Expression (3)
- Funding (154)
- Guest Bloggers (9)
- History (5)
- Hospice (1)
- Housing (6)
- Humor (6)
- ILAG (1)
- Immigration (16)
- Incnetives (5)
- Incubators (13)
- International Cooperation (18)
- International Models (27)
- IOLTA (13)
- Judicial Ethics (99)
- Judicial Supremacy (4)
- Justice Index (5)
- LAIR (9)
- Law Schools (63)
- Legal Aid (119)
- Legal Ethics (46)
- Legal Insurance (1)
- LEP (59)
- LGBT (1)
- Libel Law (1)
- Libraries (18)
- Litigant Voice (4)
- Love (3)
- LSC (77)
- Mapping/GIS (5)
- Media (9)
- Mediation (7)
- Medical System Comparision (40)
- Meetings (35)
- Metrics (31)
- Middle Income (29)
- Mixed Model (17)
- Mobile Technology (21)
- Newsmaker Interview (9)
- Non-Lawyer Practice (62)
- Obituaries and Appreciations (1)
- Outcome Measures (33)
- Personal (7)
- Plain Language (11)
- Planning (12)
- Policing (8)
- Political Issues and Justice (2)
- Political Support (16)
- Poverty (19)
- Pro Bono (61)
- Public Defender (12)
- Public Education (4)
- Public Welfare Foundation (5)
- Race (2)
- Reentry (4)
- Referral Systems (7)
- Remote Services (5)
- Research and Evalation (156)
- Rules Reform (16)
- Science (20)
- Security (6)
- Self-Help Services (194)
- Series: Outcome Measures (7)
- Simplification (48)
- Small Claims (1)
- Social Media (1)
- Social Workers (4)
- Software Developers (6)
- SRL Statistics (19)
- SRLN (13)
- State of Judiciary Speeches (3)
- Supreme Court (52)
- Systematic Change (163)
- Tax Policy (3)
- Technology (216)
- This Blog (20)
- Tools (12)
- Transitions (4)
- Transparency (21)
- Triage (73)
- Unbundling (50)
- Uncategorized (10)
- Usabilty (4)
- Veterans (3)
- video (5)
- Vocation (9)
- White House (41)
Cannot load blog information at this time.
RSS and More
Links
- American Judges Association Blog
- ABA Access to Justice Support Center
- Concurrent Opinions Blog
- Court Technology Bulletin Blog
- Dept. of Justice ATJ Initiative
- International Access to Justice Blog (Martin Gramatikov)
- Justice Index
- LawHelp Self-Help Site
- LawyerWatch
- Lewis Kinard’s Unbundling Blog
- Legal Servces Corp
- National Assoc. of IOLTA Programs
- Nationaaal Center for Access to Justice
- National Coalition for a Civil Right to Counsel
- NLADA
- Pro Bono Net
- Pro Bono Net Blog – – Connecting Justice Communities
- SelfHelpSupport Practitioner Site
- Self-Represented Litigation Network
- State Justice Institute
- Technology and Access to Justice Website
- Virtual Law Practice Blog
- Zorza ATJ Site
- Zorza Politics and Humor Blog
- Zorza (Richard) Medical Status Site
- Zorzas Retirement Community
Category Archives: Document Assembly
Online Form to Request Interpreters
The Utah Courts have put up online the pdf form that can be used to request an interpreter (Spanish version). Here is the instruction page. As the instruction page says: You must request a court interpreter at least 3 days … Continue reading
Posted in Document Assembly, LEP
Comments Off on Online Form to Request Interpreters
Claudia Johnson on “The Year in Forms”
The year in legal online forms for the most vulnerable in our society…2011 a recap of increasing access to justice. I listen to the Beatles all the time, and there is this song that asks “what have you done?” that … Continue reading
Posted in Document Assembly, LEP, Pro Bono
2 Comments
Making the Cost Effectiveness Case
Pro Bono Net’s LawHelp Interactive project has out a nice example of what in business they call a “customer case study.” Its a two pager describing the impact on the New York courts of their deployment of document assembly. Key … Continue reading
Posted in Document Assembly, Technology
Tagged Cost Benefit
Comments Off on Making the Cost Effectiveness Case
Claudia Johnson Bloggs on Online Interviewing Issues
Claudia writes: The recent post here on online document assembly and the corollary issue of online interviewing techniques triggered may thoughts I want to share w/the readers of this blog. Online interviewing techniques in legal aid, is a very new … Continue reading
Innovation Ideas Based on SJI Priority Investment Areas
A few days ago I blogged on the excellent new State Justice Institute Priority Investment Areas, which now guides much of SJI’s grantmaking. Today I am going to make some suggestions for innovative possible projects in each of those areas, … Continue reading
Posted in Court Management, Document Assembly, Funding, Judicial Ethics, Law Schools, LEP, Self-Help Services
Tagged Elder, Immigration, SJI
Comments Off on Innovation Ideas Based on SJI Priority Investment Areas
Guest Blogger Claudia Johnston Reflecting on Public Interest Lawyers, Technology and Change
We are living in revolutionary times. It is the first time, since 1968, when I was just a babe learning to talk by listening to the Beattles in El Salvador, that we see such amount of change and restructuring and … Continue reading
Wayne Moore Makes Suggestions for Legal Aid on “How to Cut Costs Without Cutting Services”
Wayne Moore has responded to the legal aid budget crisis with this insightful and intensely practical memo on how legal aid programs can protect service delivery in a tough time. I urge all, including those who have been somewhat critical … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Justice Generally, Budget Issues, Document Assembly, Legal Aid, LSC, Pro Bono, Self-Help Services, Systematic Change, Technology, Unbundling
Comments Off on Wayne Moore Makes Suggestions for Legal Aid on “How to Cut Costs Without Cutting Services”
Written Versus Oral Reporting — Implications for Forms Programs
Question for readers of this post. It is getting a lot of hits. Does anyone know what is listing/referring/using it? My analytics are not telling me anything. Please tell me by sending me an e-mail, richard(at)zorza.net. Thanks: ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Richard Moorhead … Continue reading
Posted in Document Assembly, Forms, Research and Evalation, Technology
3 Comments
Order in LegalZoom Case
See August 23, 2011, update at end of post for links to reports of proposed settlement in this case The District Court has issued an order in the Missouri LegalZoom Case. Bottom line: The District Court rejects LegalZoom’s Motion for … Continue reading
Important New Report/Compilation on Self-Representation Resources in the States from John Greacen and Michigan State Bar Foundation
We have long needed a compilation of what the states have in place to assist the self-represented, and the Michigan State Bar Foundation recently contracted with John Greacen of Greacen Associates to prepare such a document to assist the state … Continue reading
Posted in Document Assembly, Forms, Judicial Ethics, Self-Help Services, Technology
Comments Off on Important New Report/Compilation on Self-Representation Resources in the States from John Greacen and Michigan State Bar Foundation
Unauthorized Practice of Law Issues and the “Not Malpractice” Test
The Forbes blog has an interesting post collecting a number of recent developments in UPL. It includes a Missouri lawyers’ class action against Legal Zoom, and cases from Kentucky and Ohio. The post takes a generally anti-regulatory tone, with a … Continue reading
NCSC Issues Compilation of Re-Engineering Ideas
The National Center for State Courts has issued an eleven page complication of ideas for re-engineering. Lots of good stuff. Here is the summary chart:
Posted in Document Assembly, Forms, Systematic Change, Technology, Triage
Comments Off on NCSC Issues Compilation of Re-Engineering Ideas
Turner and the Self-Represented — A Summary of Its Very Broad Implications and The Begining of a New Jurisprudence
Below find the full text of my post on ConcurringOpinions titlted Turner’s Trombone Blows for Every Self-Represented Litigant. It is, of course, part of the Synposium on the case that David Udell and I are co-hosting. Turner v. Rogers, 564 … Continue reading
Turner v. Rogers is Released — Due Process Requires Reversal Despite Lack of Categorical Right to Counsel — Symposium Launched on ComcurringOpinions
The Supreme Court has decided Turner v. Rogers. Opinion by Justice Breyer (5-4), with Justice Kennedy joining the majority. http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/10pdf/10-10.pdf. AP Story, via NYT David Udell and I have launched our Symposium on ConcurrngOpinions. The post below is a copy … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Counsel, Dept. of Justice, Document Assembly, Forms, Judicial Ethics, Legal Aid, Self-Help Services, Supreme Court, Triage
Comments Off on Turner v. Rogers is Released — Due Process Requires Reversal Despite Lack of Categorical Right to Counsel — Symposium Launched on ComcurringOpinions
What Online Services Does Your State Government Provide for Key Low Income Benefit Programs — Center for Budget Maps the States
The Center for Budget and Policy Priorities has just revised its Report (html version) collecting detailed information on the services that are provided online by all the states for the key low-income benefit programs: SNAP (the benefit program previously known … Continue reading
Posted in Document Assembly, Forms, Technology
Tagged Public Benefits
Comments Off on What Online Services Does Your State Government Provide for Key Low Income Benefit Programs — Center for Budget Maps the States