Full Site Automatic Translation By Google
Notice
Opinions are personal, and only those of the authors themselves. This blog is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice. Copyright reserved 2010-2016.ABA Journal Honoree 2017
-
Join 2,205 other subscribers
Most Recent Comments
Sara Case on Judiciary Committee Democrats… james burdick on Study Showing Greater Racial B… Holly Eaton on Excuses for Not Agreeing to Re… richardzorza on Trump-Olson Retainer and Non-D… Ken Burton on Trump-Olson Retainer and Non-D… -
Most Recent Posts
- Nixon, Trump and the Nexis Between Evil Policy and Core Crimes
- How the Access To Justice Movement is Helping Constrain Trumpism
- Becky Sandefur is a MacArthur!!!
- Judiciary Committee Democrats Should Call the Republican “Assistant” as an Expert Witness on Sex Assault Reporting and Veracity
- Where the Investigation is Headed: Some Propositions
- A Telling Moment
- What a Real Apology Takes
- The Corporate Response to Trump
- Justice Kennedy’s Opinion On “Baking Discrimination” Is Clarion Call for Process Neutrality In The Entire Governmental Sphere
- Study Showing Greater Racial Bias By Republican Judges Has to Shatter Our Assumptions
Posts by Month
Top Posts & Pages
Posts by Category
- 100% Access Strategy and Campaign (56)
- ABA (15)
- Access to Counsel (80)
- Access to Justice Boards (89)
- Access to Justice Generally (340)
- Administative Proecdure (14)
- Alternative Business Structures (4)
- Anti-Trust (8)
- Appellate Practice (5)
- Appreciations (1)
- Artificial Intelligence (2)
- Attorney-Client (24)
- Bail (5)
- Bankruptcy (4)
- Bar Associations (27)
- Bias (2)
- Books (3)
- Budget Issues (35)
- Census Bureau (6)
- Chasm with Communities (17)
- Child Support (12)
- Commentators (3)
- Communications Strategy (29)
- Congress (3)
- Constitution (13)
- Consumer Rights (13)
- Contempt (1)
- Court Fees and Costs (14)
- Court Management (98)
- Criminal Law (36)
- De-Regulation (8)
- Death Penalty (1)
- Debt Collction (3)
- Defender Programs (20)
- Dept. of Justice (64)
- Discrimination (15)
- Document Assembly (50)
- Domestic Violence (16)
- E-filing (7)
- Evictions (7)
- Evidence (2)
- expungement (6)
- Family Law (11)
- Federal Agencies (11)
- Federal Courts (25)
- Foreclosure (27)
- Forms (57)
- Freedom of Expression (3)
- Funding (154)
- Guest Bloggers (9)
- History (5)
- Hospice (1)
- Housing (6)
- Humor (6)
- ILAG (1)
- Immigration (16)
- Incnetives (5)
- Incubators (13)
- International Cooperation (18)
- International Models (27)
- IOLTA (13)
- Judicial Ethics (99)
- Judicial Supremacy (4)
- Justice Index (5)
- LAIR (9)
- Law Schools (63)
- Legal Aid (119)
- Legal Ethics (46)
- Legal Insurance (1)
- LEP (59)
- LGBT (1)
- Libel Law (1)
- Libraries (18)
- Litigant Voice (4)
- Love (3)
- LSC (77)
- Mapping/GIS (5)
- Media (9)
- Mediation (7)
- Medical System Comparision (40)
- Meetings (35)
- Metrics (31)
- Middle Income (29)
- Mixed Model (17)
- Mobile Technology (21)
- Newsmaker Interview (9)
- Non-Lawyer Practice (62)
- Obituaries and Appreciations (1)
- Outcome Measures (33)
- Personal (7)
- Plain Language (11)
- Planning (12)
- Policing (8)
- Political Issues and Justice (2)
- Political Support (16)
- Poverty (19)
- Pro Bono (61)
- Public Defender (12)
- Public Education (4)
- Public Welfare Foundation (5)
- Race (2)
- Reentry (4)
- Referral Systems (7)
- Remote Services (5)
- Research and Evalation (156)
- Rules Reform (16)
- Science (20)
- Security (6)
- Self-Help Services (194)
- Series: Outcome Measures (7)
- Simplification (48)
- Small Claims (1)
- Social Media (1)
- Social Workers (4)
- Software Developers (6)
- SRL Statistics (19)
- SRLN (13)
- State of Judiciary Speeches (3)
- Supreme Court (52)
- Systematic Change (163)
- Tax Policy (3)
- Technology (216)
- This Blog (20)
- Tools (12)
- Transitions (4)
- Transparency (21)
- Triage (73)
- Unbundling (50)
- Uncategorized (10)
- Usabilty (4)
- Veterans (3)
- video (5)
- Vocation (9)
- White House (41)
Cannot load blog information at this time.
RSS and More
Links
- American Judges Association Blog
- ABA Access to Justice Support Center
- Concurrent Opinions Blog
- Court Technology Bulletin Blog
- Dept. of Justice ATJ Initiative
- International Access to Justice Blog (Martin Gramatikov)
- Justice Index
- LawHelp Self-Help Site
- LawyerWatch
- Lewis Kinard’s Unbundling Blog
- Legal Servces Corp
- National Assoc. of IOLTA Programs
- Nationaaal Center for Access to Justice
- National Coalition for a Civil Right to Counsel
- NLADA
- Pro Bono Net
- Pro Bono Net Blog – – Connecting Justice Communities
- SelfHelpSupport Practitioner Site
- Self-Represented Litigation Network
- State Justice Institute
- Technology and Access to Justice Website
- Virtual Law Practice Blog
- Zorza ATJ Site
- Zorza Politics and Humor Blog
- Zorza (Richard) Medical Status Site
- Zorzas Retirement Community
Category Archives: Federal Courts
Jim Sandman’s Comment on the Nomination of Judge Garland and Access to Justice
Many of us have been wondering about the potential implications of the nomination of Judge Garland for access to justice. Well, here is one very important clue, a comment by LSC President Jim Sandman. Jim is, of course, a former … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Justice Generally, Federal Courts, Supreme Court, White House
Comments Off on Jim Sandman’s Comment on the Nomination of Judge Garland and Access to Justice
Add Access to Justice As A Criteria for “Just Companies” An Idea Urged By Paul Tudor Jones II, hedge-fund billionaire
Under the wonderful headline, A Plan to Rank ‘Just’ Companies Aims to Close the Wealth Gap, Alexandra Stanley has a great article in today’s New York Times. Like all the best ideas, this one is simple: Paul Tudor Jones II, … Continue reading
Courts are Dysfunctinal for Different Kinds of Litigants in Profoundly Different Ways
It seems to me that the discussions about how to make courts work again have suffered from a problem of fragmentation. While basically all courts operate under the same rules, based on the 1930’s Federal Rule project, there are now … Continue reading
Posted in Federal Courts, Foreclosure, Rules Reform, Simplification, Systematic Change
Comments Off on Courts are Dysfunctinal for Different Kinds of Litigants in Profoundly Different Ways
More On Impact of DC Events on Judicial Deference to Congress
Professor Tribe has pointed out to me, in response to my recent blog post about the possible impact of DC happenings on judicial deference to Congress, that: “. . . deference to Congress isn’t either good or bad in itself, … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Justice Generally, Budget Issues, Federal Courts, Supreme Court
Comments Off on More On Impact of DC Events on Judicial Deference to Congress
Will DC Events Impact Judicial Deference to Congress
There is an interesting article in Politico today about how anger at Congress is increasing in the Federal Judiciary. The article focuses mainly on how upset the courts are at the financial impact of sequestration and the shutdown on the … Continue reading
What Happens When a Federal Court Pays Attention to the Self-Represented — the Central District of California Bankruptcy Court Is A Model for Us All
The Central District of California Bankruptcy Court has released its report on the self-represented. Self-represented, or pro se, litigants comprise over one quarter of the debtors filing in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California. In early … Continue reading
Posted in Bankruptcy, E-filing, Federal Courts, Self-Help Services
2 Comments
Southern District of NY Pro Se Trial Manual
The Southern District of New York provides to all self-represented litigants whose cases are scheduled for trial this Trial-Ready Manual, prepared with the assistance of the Committee of the Federal Courts of the New York County Lawyers’ Association. As the … Continue reading
Posted in Federal Courts, Self-Help Services, Simplification
Comments Off on Southern District of NY Pro Se Trial Manual
First Reports of Survey of Federal Court Self-Represented Litigation Services
As the Federal Court blog puts it: “The Judicial Conference Committee on Court Administration and Case Management (CACM) asked the Federal Judicial Center (FJC) to survey chief district judges and clerks of court on the assistance their district courts provide … Continue reading
Posted in Federal Courts, Pro Bono, Self-Help Services, Unbundling
Comments Off on First Reports of Survey of Federal Court Self-Represented Litigation Services
New Stats on Increasing Federal Non-Prisoner SRL Cases — More Federal Court SRL Program Networking Starting
The US Courts News Blog has undated statistics on prisoner and non-prisoner self-represented cases. Key text: But the number of non-prisoner pro se cases has been climbing as well. In FY 2010, that total was 24,319. It was 22,821 in … Continue reading
Posted in Federal Courts, Self-Help Services, SRL Statistics, Unbundling
Comments Off on New Stats on Increasing Federal Non-Prisoner SRL Cases — More Federal Court SRL Program Networking Starting
Pro Se Clerks in the Federal Courts — A Base for Self-Help Innovation
The Third Branch, with official news from the Federal Courts, has an interesting piece on pro se clerks in the Federal system. The core point: the court staff put in place to deal with prisoner petitions are now working on … Continue reading
Posted in Federal Courts, Meetings, Self-Help Services, Unbundling
Comments Off on Pro Se Clerks in the Federal Courts — A Base for Self-Help Innovation