Full Site Automatic Translation By Google
Notice
Opinions are personal, and only those of the authors themselves. This blog is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice. Copyright reserved 2010-2016.ABA Journal Honoree 2017

-
Join 903 other subscribers
Most Recent Comments
Sara Case on Judiciary Committee Democrats… james burdick on Study Showing Greater Racial B… Holly Eaton on Excuses for Not Agreeing to Re… richardzorza on Trump-Olson Retainer and Non-D… Ken Burton on Trump-Olson Retainer and Non-D… -
Most Recent Posts
- Nixon, Trump and the Nexis Between Evil Policy and Core Crimes
- How the Access To Justice Movement is Helping Constrain Trumpism
- Becky Sandefur is a MacArthur!!!
- Judiciary Committee Democrats Should Call the Republican “Assistant” as an Expert Witness on Sex Assault Reporting and Veracity
- Where the Investigation is Headed: Some Propositions
- A Telling Moment
- What a Real Apology Takes
- The Corporate Response to Trump
- Justice Kennedy’s Opinion On “Baking Discrimination” Is Clarion Call for Process Neutrality In The Entire Governmental Sphere
- Study Showing Greater Racial Bias By Republican Judges Has to Shatter Our Assumptions
Posts by Month
Top Posts & Pages
- Wayne Moore Makes Suggestions for Legal Aid on "How to Cut Costs Without Cutting Services"
- Timely and Powerful New Immigration Planning and Action Tool
- Missouri Supreme Court Judge’s Tool Kit on Pro Bono -- Perspectives on Court Use of Pro Bono
- Migration Policy Institute Data on Foreign Born as Planning Tool
- From Russia for Justice -- Alternative Models for Access to Justice In Draft Bill
- Order in LegalZoom Case
- The Highlight of the LSC TIG Conference
- Huge Flash Memory to Speed Big Data Analysis
- The Story of "Call for Justice" -- Leveraging Online Legal Information, the 211 System and Beyond
Posts by Category
- 100% Access Strategy and Campaign (56)
- ABA (15)
- Access to Counsel (80)
- Access to Justice Boards (89)
- Access to Justice Generally (340)
- Administative Proecdure (14)
- Alternative Business Structures (4)
- Anti-Trust (8)
- Appellate Practice (5)
- Appreciations (1)
- Artificial Intelligence (2)
- Attorney-Client (24)
- Bail (5)
- Bankruptcy (4)
- Bar Associations (27)
- Bias (2)
- Books (3)
- Budget Issues (35)
- Census Bureau (6)
- Chasm with Communities (17)
- Child Support (12)
- Commentators (3)
- Communications Strategy (29)
- Congress (3)
- Constitution (13)
- Consumer Rights (13)
- Contempt (1)
- Court Fees and Costs (14)
- Court Management (98)
- Criminal Law (36)
- De-Regulation (8)
- Death Penalty (1)
- Debt Collction (3)
- Defender Programs (20)
- Dept. of Justice (64)
- Discrimination (15)
- Document Assembly (50)
- Domestic Violence (16)
- E-filing (7)
- Evictions (7)
- Evidence (2)
- expungement (6)
- Family Law (11)
- Federal Agencies (11)
- Federal Courts (25)
- Foreclosure (27)
- Forms (57)
- Freedom of Expression (3)
- Funding (154)
- Guest Bloggers (9)
- History (5)
- Hospice (1)
- Housing (6)
- Humor (6)
- ILAG (1)
- Immigration (16)
- Incnetives (5)
- Incubators (13)
- International Cooperation (18)
- International Models (27)
- IOLTA (13)
- Judicial Ethics (99)
- Judicial Supremacy (4)
- Justice Index (5)
- LAIR (9)
- Law Schools (63)
- Legal Aid (119)
- Legal Ethics (46)
- Legal Insurance (1)
- LEP (59)
- LGBT (1)
- Libel Law (1)
- Libraries (18)
- Litigant Voice (4)
- Love (3)
- LSC (77)
- Mapping/GIS (5)
- Media (9)
- Mediation (7)
- Medical System Comparision (40)
- Meetings (35)
- Metrics (31)
- Middle Income (29)
- Mixed Model (17)
- Mobile Technology (21)
- Newsmaker Interview (9)
- Non-Lawyer Practice (62)
- Obituaries and Appreciations (1)
- Outcome Measures (33)
- Personal (7)
- Plain Language (11)
- Planning (12)
- Policing (8)
- Political Issues and Justice (2)
- Political Support (16)
- Poverty (19)
- Pro Bono (61)
- Public Defender (12)
- Public Education (4)
- Public Welfare Foundation (5)
- Race (2)
- Reentry (4)
- Referral Systems (7)
- Remote Services (5)
- Research and Evalation (156)
- Rules Reform (16)
- Science (20)
- Security (6)
- Self-Help Services (194)
- Series: Outcome Measures (7)
- Simplification (48)
- Small Claims (1)
- Social Media (1)
- Social Workers (4)
- Software Developers (6)
- SRL Statistics (19)
- SRLN (13)
- State of Judiciary Speeches (3)
- Supreme Court (52)
- Systematic Change (163)
- Tax Policy (3)
- Technology (216)
- This Blog (20)
- Tools (12)
- Transitions (4)
- Transparency (21)
- Triage (73)
- Unbundling (50)
- Uncategorized (10)
- Usabilty (4)
- Veterans (3)
- video (5)
- Vocation (9)
- White House (41)
Cannot load blog information at this time.
RSS and More
Links
- American Judges Association Blog
- ABA Access to Justice Support Center
- Concurrent Opinions Blog
- Court Technology Bulletin Blog
- Dept. of Justice ATJ Initiative
- International Access to Justice Blog (Martin Gramatikov)
- Justice Index
- LawHelp Self-Help Site
- LawyerWatch
- Lewis Kinard’s Unbundling Blog
- Legal Servces Corp
- National Assoc. of IOLTA Programs
- Nationaaal Center for Access to Justice
- National Coalition for a Civil Right to Counsel
- NLADA
- Pro Bono Net
- Pro Bono Net Blog – – Connecting Justice Communities
- SelfHelpSupport Practitioner Site
- Self-Represented Litigation Network
- State Justice Institute
- Technology and Access to Justice Website
- Virtual Law Practice Blog
- Zorza ATJ Site
- Zorza Politics and Humor Blog
- Zorza (Richard) Medical Status Site
- Zorzas Retirement Community
Category Archives: Systematic Change
Senate Confirms New SJI Board Member
This is great news. Early in January, the Senate confirmed New York Court of Appeals Judge Jonathan Lippman as a member of the State Justice Institute Board. Readers of this blog do not need to be reminded of CJ Lippman’s … Continue reading
Posted in Court Management, Funding, Systematic Change
Comments Off on Senate Confirms New SJI Board Member
JOLT Publishes Some of the Technology Summit Papers Highlighing Extent of Consensus
Harvard’s Journal of Legal Technology has now published some of the papers from the first LSC technology summit in a single integrated article, the table of contents of which appears below. Triage and Mobile survive directly on the list of … Continue reading
Posted in LSC, Systematic Change, Technology
2 Comments
“Sorting-Hat” Triage Article Now Posted
My article on triage, titled The Access to Justice “Sorting Hat” — Towards a System of Triage and Intake that Maximizes Access and Outcomes, 89 Denv. U. L. Rev. 859 (2012), is now online at the above link. I very … Continue reading
Posted in Systematic Change, Triage
1 Comment
Some Reflections on a Foundational Access to Justice Technology Summit.
While LSC will in the future be releasing a full Report from this week’s Access to Justice Technology Summit, I thought it appropriate to share some of my own personal impressions and hopes. It was a powerful event, with a … Continue reading
Posted in LSC, Systematic Change, Technology
6 Comments
Boston Globe Does “Ideas” Piece on Randomized Studies of Legal Aid
The Boston Globe has just run a valuable and sensible piece on the Greiner et al randomized studies. The headline sums it up: Free legal advice—but does it work?. The article will be very helpful in showing the value of … Continue reading
Non-Lawyer Practice Idea Featured on CNN Website
Professor Gillian Hadfield, who recently testified at one of the New York Access Hearings about non-lawer practice, has an important opinion piece on the CNN Website. She proves the total inadequacy of current access approaches, concluding that we simply have … Continue reading
Posted in Legal Ethics, Non-Lawyer Practice, Systematic Change
1 Comment
Canadian Court Rules Subcommittee Report Advocates Review of Rules from Point of View of the Self-Represented
The Canadian Federal Court Rules Committee Subcommittee on Global Review of the Federal Courts Rules makes an interesting recommendation: The Rules Committee should assess all existing rules from the standpoint of access to justice, particularly by self-represented parties, with a … Continue reading
Posted in Simplification, Systematic Change
Tagged Canada
Comments Off on Canadian Court Rules Subcommittee Report Advocates Review of Rules from Point of View of the Self-Represented
Court Simplification Working Paper from SRLN
The Self-Represented Litigation Network has completed its Working Paper titled Towards Simplification. The document, more a road-map than a proposal, outlines seven principles for simplification, six approaches, four barriers and political issues, and nine possible strategies. The document is here. … Continue reading
Posted in Simplification, Systematic Change
2 Comments
Two Perspectives on Standardization and Efficiency, and a Suggested Synthesis
A recent New Yorker article talks about possible lessons for the health care system from the highly efficient production and management system of middle range chain restaurants like Cheesecake Factory. To show me how a Cheesecake Factory works, [the host] … Continue reading
Judicature Article on Broad Strategic Impact of Turner v. Rogers
I am proud that Judicature has just published my new article on Turner v. Rogers: The Implications for Access to Justice Strategies. The article is aimed at courts, the bar, legal aid programs, and access to justice Commissions, with the … Continue reading
Wed July 11 is Deadline for Comments on LSC’s Draft Strategic Plan
Tomorrow, Wed July 11, is the last day to comment on LSC’s excellent Draft Strategic Plan. Any such document is bound to be somewhat controversial, and the draft represents a very major potential strengthening of LSC and its role in … Continue reading
Posted in Funding, LSC, Systematic Change
3 Comments
LSC Access to Justice Technology Summit — Inspiring Launch of A Process
The first part of the LSC Summit on Technology and Access to Justice took place last week. I think it is appropriate for me to pass on to the community some very personal and impressionistic non-specific highlights. First, it was … Continue reading
Posted in Court Management, Dept. of Justice, LSC, Systematic Change, Technology
5 Comments
Important Step Forward with Washington State Legal Technician Rule
Lots of us have been watching this long-standing but very important saga. The Washington State Supreme Court has now by Order approved a Rule generally permitting non-lawyer legal technicians. The Order does not itself authorize specific areas of legal technician … Continue reading
Posted in Legal Ethics, Simplification, Systematic Change
9 Comments
More on the Turner v. Rogers Anniversary Forum — DC In Person and Streaming Seats Available
Here is the text of the invite from HHS to the 2 PM Eastern, Wed June 20th session, to be held at Hubert H. Humphrey Building, 1st Floor Auditorium, 200 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20201: You are invited to … Continue reading
Posted in Meetings, Self-Help Services, Simplification, Supreme Court, Systematic Change
Tagged Child Support, HHS, Turner v. Rogers
1 Comment
Claudia Johnson Blogs on the Equal Justice Conference
I have been lucky enough to have been in almost every single Equal Justice Conference since 2002. My first EJC was with Tanya Neiman—she gave me the opportunity to come with her and do a workshop on holistic advocacy while … Continue reading
Posted in Systematic Change
Comments Off on Claudia Johnson Blogs on the Equal Justice Conference