Full Site Automatic Translation By Google
Notice
Opinions are personal, and only those of the authors themselves. This blog is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice. Copyright reserved 2010-2016.ABA Journal Honoree 2017

-
Join 903 other subscribers
Most Recent Comments
Sara Case on Judiciary Committee Democrats… james burdick on Study Showing Greater Racial B… Holly Eaton on Excuses for Not Agreeing to Re… richardzorza on Trump-Olson Retainer and Non-D… Ken Burton on Trump-Olson Retainer and Non-D… -
Most Recent Posts
- Nixon, Trump and the Nexis Between Evil Policy and Core Crimes
- How the Access To Justice Movement is Helping Constrain Trumpism
- Becky Sandefur is a MacArthur!!!
- Judiciary Committee Democrats Should Call the Republican “Assistant” as an Expert Witness on Sex Assault Reporting and Veracity
- Where the Investigation is Headed: Some Propositions
- A Telling Moment
- What a Real Apology Takes
- The Corporate Response to Trump
- Justice Kennedy’s Opinion On “Baking Discrimination” Is Clarion Call for Process Neutrality In The Entire Governmental Sphere
- Study Showing Greater Racial Bias By Republican Judges Has to Shatter Our Assumptions
Posts by Month
Top Posts & Pages
- Wayne Moore Makes Suggestions for Legal Aid on "How to Cut Costs Without Cutting Services"
- The Highlight of the LSC TIG Conference
- Huge Flash Memory to Speed Big Data Analysis
- Timely and Powerful New Immigration Planning and Action Tool
- Missouri Supreme Court Judge’s Tool Kit on Pro Bono -- Perspectives on Court Use of Pro Bono
- Migration Policy Institute Data on Foreign Born as Planning Tool
- From Russia for Justice -- Alternative Models for Access to Justice In Draft Bill
- Order in LegalZoom Case
- The Story of "Call for Justice" -- Leveraging Online Legal Information, the 211 System and Beyond
Posts by Category
- 100% Access Strategy and Campaign (56)
- ABA (15)
- Access to Counsel (80)
- Access to Justice Boards (89)
- Access to Justice Generally (340)
- Administative Proecdure (14)
- Alternative Business Structures (4)
- Anti-Trust (8)
- Appellate Practice (5)
- Appreciations (1)
- Artificial Intelligence (2)
- Attorney-Client (24)
- Bail (5)
- Bankruptcy (4)
- Bar Associations (27)
- Bias (2)
- Books (3)
- Budget Issues (35)
- Census Bureau (6)
- Chasm with Communities (17)
- Child Support (12)
- Commentators (3)
- Communications Strategy (29)
- Congress (3)
- Constitution (13)
- Consumer Rights (13)
- Contempt (1)
- Court Fees and Costs (14)
- Court Management (98)
- Criminal Law (36)
- De-Regulation (8)
- Death Penalty (1)
- Debt Collction (3)
- Defender Programs (20)
- Dept. of Justice (64)
- Discrimination (15)
- Document Assembly (50)
- Domestic Violence (16)
- E-filing (7)
- Evictions (7)
- Evidence (2)
- expungement (6)
- Family Law (11)
- Federal Agencies (11)
- Federal Courts (25)
- Foreclosure (27)
- Forms (57)
- Freedom of Expression (3)
- Funding (154)
- Guest Bloggers (9)
- History (5)
- Hospice (1)
- Housing (6)
- Humor (6)
- ILAG (1)
- Immigration (16)
- Incnetives (5)
- Incubators (13)
- International Cooperation (18)
- International Models (27)
- IOLTA (13)
- Judicial Ethics (99)
- Judicial Supremacy (4)
- Justice Index (5)
- LAIR (9)
- Law Schools (63)
- Legal Aid (119)
- Legal Ethics (46)
- Legal Insurance (1)
- LEP (59)
- LGBT (1)
- Libel Law (1)
- Libraries (18)
- Litigant Voice (4)
- Love (3)
- LSC (77)
- Mapping/GIS (5)
- Media (9)
- Mediation (7)
- Medical System Comparision (40)
- Meetings (35)
- Metrics (31)
- Middle Income (29)
- Mixed Model (17)
- Mobile Technology (21)
- Newsmaker Interview (9)
- Non-Lawyer Practice (62)
- Obituaries and Appreciations (1)
- Outcome Measures (33)
- Personal (7)
- Plain Language (11)
- Planning (12)
- Policing (8)
- Political Issues and Justice (2)
- Political Support (16)
- Poverty (19)
- Pro Bono (61)
- Public Defender (12)
- Public Education (4)
- Public Welfare Foundation (5)
- Race (2)
- Reentry (4)
- Referral Systems (7)
- Remote Services (5)
- Research and Evalation (156)
- Rules Reform (16)
- Science (20)
- Security (6)
- Self-Help Services (194)
- Series: Outcome Measures (7)
- Simplification (48)
- Small Claims (1)
- Social Media (1)
- Social Workers (4)
- Software Developers (6)
- SRL Statistics (19)
- SRLN (13)
- State of Judiciary Speeches (3)
- Supreme Court (52)
- Systematic Change (163)
- Tax Policy (3)
- Technology (216)
- This Blog (20)
- Tools (12)
- Transitions (4)
- Transparency (21)
- Triage (73)
- Unbundling (50)
- Uncategorized (10)
- Usabilty (4)
- Veterans (3)
- video (5)
- Vocation (9)
- White House (41)
Cannot load blog information at this time.
RSS and More
Links
- American Judges Association Blog
- ABA Access to Justice Support Center
- Concurrent Opinions Blog
- Court Technology Bulletin Blog
- Dept. of Justice ATJ Initiative
- International Access to Justice Blog (Martin Gramatikov)
- Justice Index
- LawHelp Self-Help Site
- LawyerWatch
- Lewis Kinard’s Unbundling Blog
- Legal Servces Corp
- National Assoc. of IOLTA Programs
- Nationaaal Center for Access to Justice
- National Coalition for a Civil Right to Counsel
- NLADA
- Pro Bono Net
- Pro Bono Net Blog – – Connecting Justice Communities
- SelfHelpSupport Practitioner Site
- Self-Represented Litigation Network
- State Justice Institute
- Technology and Access to Justice Website
- Virtual Law Practice Blog
- Zorza ATJ Site
- Zorza Politics and Humor Blog
- Zorza (Richard) Medical Status Site
- Zorzas Retirement Community
Category Archives: Systematic Change
A shift in Empahsis About Access Demonstrated by Retired Chief Justice Marshall of Massachusetts
The retired Massachusetts Chief, in a Boston Globe op-ed, urging contributions to legal aid programs, shows an interesting shift in emphasis in terms of how we think about the access system. It’s caught in these two paras: While judges and … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Counsel, Funding, Legal Aid, Legal Ethics, Self-Help Services, Systematic Change
Comments Off on A shift in Empahsis About Access Demonstrated by Retired Chief Justice Marshall of Massachusetts
Honoring Mike Genz and Remembering His Foundational Work
Mike Genz has retired from LSC (although I understand he hopes to continue to do some consulting work). Those who know him will not be surprised that this event passed without fanfare. Mike is not the kind of person who … Continue reading
Posted in LSC, Systematic Change, Technology, Tools
Comments Off on Honoring Mike Genz and Remembering His Foundational Work
Wayne Moore Makes Suggestions for Legal Aid on “How to Cut Costs Without Cutting Services”
Wayne Moore has responded to the legal aid budget crisis with this insightful and intensely practical memo on how legal aid programs can protect service delivery in a tough time. I urge all, including those who have been somewhat critical … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Justice Generally, Budget Issues, Document Assembly, Legal Aid, LSC, Pro Bono, Self-Help Services, Systematic Change, Technology, Unbundling
Comments Off on Wayne Moore Makes Suggestions for Legal Aid on “How to Cut Costs Without Cutting Services”
SJI Announces Priority Areas
Important news for innovation. SJI has just (yesterday) announced their new priority areas. I think most us will be both pleased and impressed. Here is the list, now on their website, as well as in E-SJINews. Priority Investment Areas On … Continue reading
Posted in Funding, LEP, Self-Help Services, Systematic Change
Tagged Elder, Immigration, SJI
1 Comment
Ten-fold Increase in Usage of Retail Health Clinics in Two Years — Implications for Legal Delivery
Is this the future of legal help too? A tenfold increase in visits to retail store based health clinics in just two years, as reported by the Washington Post, based on a recent RAND study. The data is based on … Continue reading
Is San Franciso Thinking of a Right to Counsel, or a Right to Diagnostic Triage?
An interesting idea. According to the SF Chronicle, the City Council will soon be considering a “right to counsel.” The article starts this way: San Francisco would offer eligible low-income litigants involved in custody battles, tenant-landlord disputes and other civil … Continue reading
Judge Fern Fisher Testifies for Court Simplification as Access Solution
This is an important harbinger. Judge Fern A. Fisher, Deputy Chief Administrative Judge, NYC Courts and Director of the NYS Courts Access to Justice Program, recently testified to a state Access Task Force Hearing about the importance of court simplification … Continue reading
Posted in Court Management, Forms, Systematic Change
Comments Off on Judge Fern Fisher Testifies for Court Simplification as Access Solution
California Courts Seek Comment on Draft Principles on Technology and Access to Justice
In an important development for the interaction of technology and access to justice, the California Court system is developing a document titled: Advancing Access to Justice Through Technology: Principles for Judicial Branch Initiatives. It is intended for ultimate approval by … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Justice Generally, Self-Help Services, Systematic Change, Technology
Comments Off on California Courts Seek Comment on Draft Principles on Technology and Access to Justice
Esther Lardent Calls for Triage, Simplification and Trained Non-Lawyer Assistance
Ester Lardent is one the most thoughtful pro bono (and indeed access) leaders. It is very encouraging to see her endorse triage and simplification in a recent opinion piece in the National Law Journal and available on Law.com. Triage and … Continue reading
Posted in Pro Bono, Systematic Change, Triage
Comments Off on Esther Lardent Calls for Triage, Simplification and Trained Non-Lawyer Assistance
Questions and Answers About the Attorney Diagnosis Proposal
Recently, I blogged about what I called the “Attorney Diagnosis” approach to Triage for Access to Justice. I believe that Turner may require not necessarily this, but at least some system that decides who needs what in terms of services … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Counsel, Access to Justice Generally, Legal Aid, Research and Evalation, Systematic Change
Tagged Diagnosis, Triag
Comments Off on Questions and Answers About the Attorney Diagnosis Proposal
Law School Incubators — Excellent Article and Some Thoughts
Recently, I blogged suggesting an overview of the systemic problems with the entire legal system. One of the interlinked barriers that I highlighted was “A system of professional rules and business practices that makes this [legal] expertise highly expensive to … Continue reading
Posted in Law Schools, Systematic Change
4 Comments
Brilliant Idea — Sonoma County Court Strategic Plan Highlights Litigant Assistance Network and Triage
With funding from SJI, Sonoma Court, California has completed an excellent Strategic Planning Document. While it includes many valuable ideas, and is focused at least initially somewhat on the huge challenges of providing culturally competent services, I particularly want to … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Justice Boards, Funding, Legal Aid, LEP, Self-Help Services, Systematic Change, Triage
Tagged SJI, Sonoma, Technical Assistance
3 Comments
Deregulation Versus De-monopolizing — A Complex Debate Just Begining
There has been substantially more attention in the blogsphere to the deregulation of the legal profession. See, e.g. the Wall St. Journal, law librarian blog, elawyering blog. All are worth reading. But I would urge attention to the difference between … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Justice Generally, Systematic Change
Tagged Deregulaton, Monopoly, UK
Comments Off on Deregulation Versus De-monopolizing — A Complex Debate Just Begining
Lawyers Hiring Capital, or Capital Hiring Lawyers — The Failure of the Profession to Innovate Creates a Gap
The California Lawyer has an interesting story, Investors at the Gates on the Jacoby and Meyers firm suing in three states to knock out rules preventing non lawyer participation in ownership of law firms — i.e. equity capital. On May … Continue reading
An Overview of Systemic Barriers to Access to Justice
Maybe its time to take a 22,000 mile overview of the access to justice problem. One way to do so it look at at the interacting parts of the system and how together they produce an inaccessible system. 1. A … Continue reading