The LA Times has a great cartoon on court automation that might give folks a kick.
Accompanying a (presumably humorous) piece on the potential of court automation, the cartoon has four panels. In one a person tries to fill in a form. In the second a “truth algorithm” is applied. In the third the person is told that gay marriage is OK, and the litigant says that he had applied to subdivide a plot of land, and in the fourth, the litigant is told that there is no appeal.
It is well worth clicking through and seeing the whole thing.
Seriously, the points are valid, and need to be internalized as we move forward with technology — regardless of how minor compared to what is ironically suggested in the cartoon:
- Must be easy to use for all
- Any algorithms must be transparent and legitimate — validated and known to be validated
- There have to be systems to correct errors
- For a long time — perhaps for ever — there have to human checks available
- Circularity must be avoided — a pattern of results that are algorithm driven can not alone justify an algorithm
These topics are discussed in more detail including ideas for moving forward, as well as risk minimization, in a thought exercise paper I wrote for the LSC Tech Summit.
Thanks to Bonnie Hough, who caught this and who is always on point in warning of the dangers as well as highlighting the potential benefits of technology.