Full Site Automatic Translation By Google
Notice
Opinions are personal, and only those of the authors themselves. This blog is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice. Copyright reserved 2010-2016.ABA Journal Honoree 2017

-
Join 903 other subscribers
Most Recent Comments
Sara Case on Judiciary Committee Democrats… james burdick on Study Showing Greater Racial B… Holly Eaton on Excuses for Not Agreeing to Re… richardzorza on Trump-Olson Retainer and Non-D… Ken Burton on Trump-Olson Retainer and Non-D… -
Most Recent Posts
- Nixon, Trump and the Nexis Between Evil Policy and Core Crimes
- How the Access To Justice Movement is Helping Constrain Trumpism
- Becky Sandefur is a MacArthur!!!
- Judiciary Committee Democrats Should Call the Republican “Assistant” as an Expert Witness on Sex Assault Reporting and Veracity
- Where the Investigation is Headed: Some Propositions
- A Telling Moment
- What a Real Apology Takes
- The Corporate Response to Trump
- Justice Kennedy’s Opinion On “Baking Discrimination” Is Clarion Call for Process Neutrality In The Entire Governmental Sphere
- Study Showing Greater Racial Bias By Republican Judges Has to Shatter Our Assumptions
Posts by Month
Top Posts & Pages
- Texas Supreme Court Moves Forward on Forms
- Maximizing the Impact of Turner v. Rogers -- Judges' Journal Article on Courtroom Best Practices
- Does the Concept of "Entity Regulation" Provide an Entry Point for Access Contribution Requrements
- Article on Spread of ATJ Commissions Implicitly Raises the Question Whether There is Any Good Argument Left To Justify A State Not Having an ATJ Commission
- A Fascinating Opinion by Judge Jack Weinstein (EDNY) Raises New Questions and Opportunities About the Relationship between Civil Gideon and Judicial Engagement
- Pro Bono Could Lead the Way in Resolving the Struggle for the Soul of the Legal Profession
- Court Technology Confernce (October 4-6) Registration Open David Pogue to Speak
Posts by Category
- 100% Access Strategy and Campaign (56)
- ABA (15)
- Access to Counsel (80)
- Access to Justice Boards (89)
- Access to Justice Generally (340)
- Administative Proecdure (14)
- Alternative Business Structures (4)
- Anti-Trust (8)
- Appellate Practice (5)
- Appreciations (1)
- Artificial Intelligence (2)
- Attorney-Client (24)
- Bail (5)
- Bankruptcy (4)
- Bar Associations (27)
- Bias (2)
- Books (3)
- Budget Issues (35)
- Census Bureau (6)
- Chasm with Communities (17)
- Child Support (12)
- Commentators (3)
- Communications Strategy (29)
- Congress (3)
- Constitution (13)
- Consumer Rights (13)
- Contempt (1)
- Court Fees and Costs (14)
- Court Management (98)
- Criminal Law (36)
- De-Regulation (8)
- Death Penalty (1)
- Debt Collction (3)
- Defender Programs (20)
- Dept. of Justice (64)
- Discrimination (15)
- Document Assembly (50)
- Domestic Violence (16)
- E-filing (7)
- Evictions (7)
- Evidence (2)
- expungement (6)
- Family Law (11)
- Federal Agencies (11)
- Federal Courts (25)
- Foreclosure (27)
- Forms (57)
- Freedom of Expression (3)
- Funding (154)
- Guest Bloggers (9)
- History (5)
- Hospice (1)
- Housing (6)
- Humor (6)
- ILAG (1)
- Immigration (16)
- Incnetives (5)
- Incubators (13)
- International Cooperation (18)
- International Models (27)
- IOLTA (13)
- Judicial Ethics (99)
- Judicial Supremacy (4)
- Justice Index (5)
- LAIR (9)
- Law Schools (63)
- Legal Aid (119)
- Legal Ethics (46)
- Legal Insurance (1)
- LEP (59)
- LGBT (1)
- Libel Law (1)
- Libraries (18)
- Litigant Voice (4)
- Love (3)
- LSC (77)
- Mapping/GIS (5)
- Media (9)
- Mediation (7)
- Medical System Comparision (40)
- Meetings (35)
- Metrics (31)
- Middle Income (29)
- Mixed Model (17)
- Mobile Technology (21)
- Newsmaker Interview (9)
- Non-Lawyer Practice (62)
- Obituaries and Appreciations (1)
- Outcome Measures (33)
- Personal (7)
- Plain Language (11)
- Planning (12)
- Policing (8)
- Political Issues and Justice (2)
- Political Support (16)
- Poverty (19)
- Pro Bono (61)
- Public Defender (12)
- Public Education (4)
- Public Welfare Foundation (5)
- Race (2)
- Reentry (4)
- Referral Systems (7)
- Remote Services (5)
- Research and Evalation (156)
- Rules Reform (16)
- Science (20)
- Security (6)
- Self-Help Services (194)
- Series: Outcome Measures (7)
- Simplification (48)
- Small Claims (1)
- Social Media (1)
- Social Workers (4)
- Software Developers (6)
- SRL Statistics (19)
- SRLN (13)
- State of Judiciary Speeches (3)
- Supreme Court (52)
- Systematic Change (163)
- Tax Policy (3)
- Technology (216)
- This Blog (20)
- Tools (12)
- Transitions (4)
- Transparency (21)
- Triage (73)
- Unbundling (50)
- Uncategorized (10)
- Usabilty (4)
- Veterans (3)
- video (5)
- Vocation (9)
- White House (41)
Cannot load blog information at this time.
RSS and More
Links
- American Judges Association Blog
- ABA Access to Justice Support Center
- Concurrent Opinions Blog
- Court Technology Bulletin Blog
- Dept. of Justice ATJ Initiative
- International Access to Justice Blog (Martin Gramatikov)
- Justice Index
- LawHelp Self-Help Site
- LawyerWatch
- Lewis Kinard’s Unbundling Blog
- Legal Servces Corp
- National Assoc. of IOLTA Programs
- Nationaaal Center for Access to Justice
- National Coalition for a Civil Right to Counsel
- NLADA
- Pro Bono Net
- Pro Bono Net Blog – – Connecting Justice Communities
- SelfHelpSupport Practitioner Site
- Self-Represented Litigation Network
- State Justice Institute
- Technology and Access to Justice Website
- Virtual Law Practice Blog
- Zorza ATJ Site
- Zorza Politics and Humor Blog
- Zorza (Richard) Medical Status Site
- Zorzas Retirement Community
Category Archives: Funding
Keeping Open to Research Regardless of Perceived Risk By Minimizing Error in Use of Access Research
This is a modified version of my post yesterday, Avoiding the Shut Down Effect From Uncertain Research Results in the online Symposium conducted by the Concurring Opinions blog. That blog is about some research, previously highlighted on this blog, into … Continue reading
Posted in Funding, Law Schools, Legal Aid, Research and Evalation
1 Comment
Americorps and Justice Corps
Some of you may have noticed that Americorps is one of the programs being targeted in the House budget (NYT). You may not be aware that Justice Corps is funded through the Americorps budget. Justice Corps is one of the … Continue reading
Posted in Funding, Technology
Comments Off on Americorps and Justice Corps
UK Considers Possible Negative Impact on Court Operations of Legal Aid Cuts. Discussion of “Polluter Pays”
As you may know, UK legal aid is facing massive budget cuts. Since even the civil system is an entitlement one (in dramatic contrast to the US), the means the new government (Conservative and Liberal Democratic, both took more than … Continue reading
Posted in Budget Issues, Funding, Research and Evalation
Tagged UK
Comments Off on UK Considers Possible Negative Impact on Court Operations of Legal Aid Cuts. Discussion of “Polluter Pays”
Politico Reports on House Budget Cut of Equal Access to Justice Act Reimbursement for Soc Sec and Vets Cases
Politico today reports on a little noticed element of the House Budget. According to the article, the proposed continuing resolution budget, (at section 4007) would cut off, for the remainder of the fiscal year, payments under the Equal Access to … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Counsel, Funding
Tagged Federal Courts, Social Security, Veterans
Comments Off on Politico Reports on House Budget Cut of Equal Access to Justice Act Reimbursement for Soc Sec and Vets Cases
NY Courts Attempt to Provide “Legal Assistance or Representation” at all Initial Foreclosure Settlement Conferences
As NY Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman announced in his State of the Judiciary today, and as the NYT is reporting, the NY courts are taking steps to make sure that there is greater help in foreclosure cases for homeowners. Please … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Counsel, Foreclosure, Funding, Legal Aid
Tagged New York, Settlment Conference
Comments Off on NY Courts Attempt to Provide “Legal Assistance or Representation” at all Initial Foreclosure Settlement Conferences
NYT Cute Budget Visualization Tool
The NYT has a great tool for visualizing the President’s proposed 2012 Federal budget. It shows the whole budget as blocks, and you can zoom in and/or search by agency (LSC at $450 million, SJI at $5 million). For anyone … Continue reading
Posted in Funding, Legal Aid
Tagged Visualization
Comments Off on NYT Cute Budget Visualization Tool
LSC TIG Request for Letters of Intent
The LSC TIG request for Letters of Intent is now out. The Letters of Intent (LOI) are due Monday March 7, 2011. This Wed Feb 16 webinar (update — now available here) on the process would be particularly helpful for … Continue reading
Posted in Document Assembly, Forms, Funding, Law Schools, LEP, Libraries, Mobile Technology, Pro Bono, Self-Help Services, Technology
Tagged Back Office Software, TIG
Comments Off on LSC TIG Request for Letters of Intent
Stabilizing IOLTA Funding — Long Term Strategy
Bloomberg and others are reporting on administration proposals to reduce the burden on the states of the huge accumulated UI debt to the feds that many states are now carrying. This set me thinking about how one long term strategy … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Justice Generally, Funding, IOLTA, Systematic Change
Tagged Filing Fee, Unemployment Insurance
1 Comment
LSC to Invite Letters of Intent for TIG Grants This Coming Week of Feb 7 — Likely Due in about a Few Weeks — Some Ideas
LSC has posted to LS-Tech that it plans to announce its invitation to submit letters of intent (LOI) for TIG Grants this coming week (i.e the week of Feb 7). Last year the LOI phase was open for four weeks. … Continue reading
Posted in Document Assembly, Funding, Technology
Comments Off on LSC to Invite Letters of Intent for TIG Grants This Coming Week of Feb 7 — Likely Due in about a Few Weeks — Some Ideas
LSC Board Hears Briefing on Technology and Innovation
Last Thursday, I was part of a group that briefed the LSC Board on Technology and Innovation at an open briefing prior to its formal meeting later in the week. Incoming LSC President Jim Sandman was present, as were four … Continue reading
Posted in Funding, Legal Aid, Technology
Tagged TIG
Comments Off on LSC Board Hears Briefing on Technology and Innovation
Massachusetts Public Defender System Reform Debate — Implications for Civil Access Too
Massachusetts has what is generally regarded as one of the best public defender systems in the country. It is a true “mixed model” in which one board and organization manages both a group of about 200 salaried lawyers (the … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Counsel, Funding
1 Comment
Ontario Moves on Sign Languge Interpretation in Legal Context — A Suggestion for an IOLTA Innovation Pool
The Law Foundation of Ontario, their IOLTA program, has what we in the US would call an RFP out for projects dealing with Sign Language Interpretation in the legal system. Applicants can be “from across Canada” The grant program comes … Continue reading
Maryland Access to Justice Commission Civil Right to Counsel Implementation Analysis includes Mixed Model and Cost Estimate
Good for the Maryland Access to Justice Commission! Their very interesting and innovative Implementing a Civil Right to Counsel in Maryland has several important features worthy of emulation. First, it proposes a “mixed model,” which means that services would be … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Counsel, Access to Justice Boards, Access to Justice Generally, Funding, Middle Income
Tagged costing, judicare, Maryland
Comments Off on Maryland Access to Justice Commission Civil Right to Counsel Implementation Analysis includes Mixed Model and Cost Estimate
Celebrating the Access to Justice Technology Community — Thoughts for Next year TIG Grants and Direction
I am here at the LSC TIG (Technology Initiative Grants) program conference in New Mexico, and want to take the opportunity to celebrate that community and suggest how we should build on its achievements. Lets start the conversation about how … Continue reading
Three More SJI Board Nominees Confirmed.
The US Senate has confirmed three more people to the SJI Board. This is pasted from the SJI website: Chase Rogers has been the Chief Justice of the Connecticut Supreme Court since 2007. Prior to that, she served as a … Continue reading