Full Site Automatic Translation By Google
Notice
Opinions are personal, and only those of the authors themselves. This blog is for informational purposes only and does not provide legal advice. Copyright reserved 2010-2016.ABA Journal Honoree 2017

-
Join 903 other subscribers
Most Recent Comments
Sara Case on Judiciary Committee Democrats… james burdick on Study Showing Greater Racial B… Holly Eaton on Excuses for Not Agreeing to Re… richardzorza on Trump-Olson Retainer and Non-D… Ken Burton on Trump-Olson Retainer and Non-D… -
Most Recent Posts
- Nixon, Trump and the Nexis Between Evil Policy and Core Crimes
- How the Access To Justice Movement is Helping Constrain Trumpism
- Becky Sandefur is a MacArthur!!!
- Judiciary Committee Democrats Should Call the Republican “Assistant” as an Expert Witness on Sex Assault Reporting and Veracity
- Where the Investigation is Headed: Some Propositions
- A Telling Moment
- What a Real Apology Takes
- The Corporate Response to Trump
- Justice Kennedy’s Opinion On “Baking Discrimination” Is Clarion Call for Process Neutrality In The Entire Governmental Sphere
- Study Showing Greater Racial Bias By Republican Judges Has to Shatter Our Assumptions
Posts by Month
Top Posts & Pages
- Maximizing the Impact of Turner v. Rogers -- Judges' Journal Article on Courtroom Best Practices
- Pro Bono Could Lead the Way in Resolving the Struggle for the Soul of the Legal Profession
- Unauthorized Practice of Law Issues and the "Not Malpractice" Test
- Tribute to Judge Fern Fisher On Her Retirement From The New York Courts
Posts by Category
- 100% Access Strategy and Campaign (56)
- ABA (15)
- Access to Counsel (80)
- Access to Justice Boards (89)
- Access to Justice Generally (340)
- Administative Proecdure (14)
- Alternative Business Structures (4)
- Anti-Trust (8)
- Appellate Practice (5)
- Appreciations (1)
- Artificial Intelligence (2)
- Attorney-Client (24)
- Bail (5)
- Bankruptcy (4)
- Bar Associations (27)
- Bias (2)
- Books (3)
- Budget Issues (35)
- Census Bureau (6)
- Chasm with Communities (17)
- Child Support (12)
- Commentators (3)
- Communications Strategy (29)
- Congress (3)
- Constitution (13)
- Consumer Rights (13)
- Contempt (1)
- Court Fees and Costs (14)
- Court Management (98)
- Criminal Law (36)
- De-Regulation (8)
- Death Penalty (1)
- Debt Collction (3)
- Defender Programs (20)
- Dept. of Justice (64)
- Discrimination (15)
- Document Assembly (50)
- Domestic Violence (16)
- E-filing (7)
- Evictions (7)
- Evidence (2)
- expungement (6)
- Family Law (11)
- Federal Agencies (11)
- Federal Courts (25)
- Foreclosure (27)
- Forms (57)
- Freedom of Expression (3)
- Funding (154)
- Guest Bloggers (9)
- History (5)
- Hospice (1)
- Housing (6)
- Humor (6)
- ILAG (1)
- Immigration (16)
- Incnetives (5)
- Incubators (13)
- International Cooperation (18)
- International Models (27)
- IOLTA (13)
- Judicial Ethics (99)
- Judicial Supremacy (4)
- Justice Index (5)
- LAIR (9)
- Law Schools (63)
- Legal Aid (119)
- Legal Ethics (46)
- Legal Insurance (1)
- LEP (59)
- LGBT (1)
- Libel Law (1)
- Libraries (18)
- Litigant Voice (4)
- Love (3)
- LSC (77)
- Mapping/GIS (5)
- Media (9)
- Mediation (7)
- Medical System Comparision (40)
- Meetings (35)
- Metrics (31)
- Middle Income (29)
- Mixed Model (17)
- Mobile Technology (21)
- Newsmaker Interview (9)
- Non-Lawyer Practice (62)
- Obituaries and Appreciations (1)
- Outcome Measures (33)
- Personal (7)
- Plain Language (11)
- Planning (12)
- Policing (8)
- Political Issues and Justice (2)
- Political Support (16)
- Poverty (19)
- Pro Bono (61)
- Public Defender (12)
- Public Education (4)
- Public Welfare Foundation (5)
- Race (2)
- Reentry (4)
- Referral Systems (7)
- Remote Services (5)
- Research and Evalation (156)
- Rules Reform (16)
- Science (20)
- Security (6)
- Self-Help Services (194)
- Series: Outcome Measures (7)
- Simplification (48)
- Small Claims (1)
- Social Media (1)
- Social Workers (4)
- Software Developers (6)
- SRL Statistics (19)
- SRLN (13)
- State of Judiciary Speeches (3)
- Supreme Court (52)
- Systematic Change (163)
- Tax Policy (3)
- Technology (216)
- This Blog (20)
- Tools (12)
- Transitions (4)
- Transparency (21)
- Triage (73)
- Unbundling (50)
- Uncategorized (10)
- Usabilty (4)
- Veterans (3)
- video (5)
- Vocation (9)
- White House (41)
Cannot load blog information at this time.
RSS and More
Links
- American Judges Association Blog
- ABA Access to Justice Support Center
- Concurrent Opinions Blog
- Court Technology Bulletin Blog
- Dept. of Justice ATJ Initiative
- International Access to Justice Blog (Martin Gramatikov)
- Justice Index
- LawHelp Self-Help Site
- LawyerWatch
- Lewis Kinard’s Unbundling Blog
- Legal Servces Corp
- National Assoc. of IOLTA Programs
- Nationaaal Center for Access to Justice
- National Coalition for a Civil Right to Counsel
- NLADA
- Pro Bono Net
- Pro Bono Net Blog – – Connecting Justice Communities
- SelfHelpSupport Practitioner Site
- Self-Represented Litigation Network
- State Justice Institute
- Technology and Access to Justice Website
- Virtual Law Practice Blog
- Zorza ATJ Site
- Zorza Politics and Humor Blog
- Zorza (Richard) Medical Status Site
- Zorzas Retirement Community
Author Archives: richardzorza
Maybe a Good Time to Approach Philanthropy
Now might be a particularly good time to approach foundations and other philanthropists. We all know about the incredible work that the Public Welfare Foundation has done to support access to justice. (Disclosure: including by helping me.) Now, President Mary … Continue reading
Study on Legal Service Providers in the UK Operating as Alternative Business Structures
In the UK, there is now a system in which lawyers and non-lawyers can co-own and can have outside investors in legal service providing organizations. They are called ABS (Alternative Business Structures handbook here). A recent research report on pricing … Continue reading
Posted in Alternative Business Structures, International Models, Metrics, Research and Evalation
Comments Off on Study on Legal Service Providers in the UK Operating as Alternative Business Structures
Get a Webinar Preview of the Resource Guide on Remote Services for Self-Represented
On April 27, 1-2pm EST, under the auspices of SRLN, John Greacen and others will be presenting a webinar on the new Guide to Remote Services for the Self-Represented. Given the new focus on strategic planning, for 100%, as called … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Justice Generally, Court Management, Self-Help Services, Technology
Comments Off on Get a Webinar Preview of the Resource Guide on Remote Services for Self-Represented
We Lose a Special Giant, Pro Bono Pioneer Esther Lardent
The Pro Bono Institute, which she founded, has announced the death of Esther Lardent. It is with profound sorrow that the Board of Directors of the Pro Bono Institute marks the passing of our beloved friend and founder Esther F. … Continue reading
Posted in History, Pro Bono, Vocation
3 Comments
Thoughts For Federal Agencies and ATJ Commissions Building on the White House LAIR Meeting
I am not sure that the ATJ Community fully appreciates the scope of the implications of the recent Legal Aid Inter-agency Round-table inaugural meeting, about which I first blogged here. Nor, I suspect do all Federal agencies yet realize the … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Justice Boards, Administative Proecdure, Dept. of Justice, Federal Agencies, Federal Courts, Funding, LAIR, White House
Comments Off on Thoughts For Federal Agencies and ATJ Commissions Building on the White House LAIR Meeting
The Key to Making “Uber for Lawyers” Work
A recent blog post by a professor at Albany Law School explores whether an “Uber for Lawyers” would work. (Longer paper, which includes triage and continuum of services, here). His argument: By offering technology-enabled legal services through an internet- or … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Counsel, Access to Justice Boards, Funding, Technology, Triage
2 Comments
Does the Concept of “Entity Regulation” Provide an Entry Point for Access Contribution Requrements
The ABA Commission on the Future of Legal Services has just released for comment an Issues Paper Concerning Unregulated LSP Entities. The basic idea is that currently unregulated legal services provider entities, such as online document assembly services, might be … Continue reading
What the 100% Access Movement Can Learn From the Cancer Moonshot
Earlier this week, I was at the Johns Hopkins Hospital launch of their Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy. This is part of the Obama Administration’s Cancer Moonshot, led by Joe Biden. The PR was brilliantly handled, and Joe Biden spoke from … Continue reading
Posted in 100% Access Strategy and Campaign, Medical System Comparision
Comments Off on What the 100% Access Movement Can Learn From the Cancer Moonshot
Towards a “Long Term Impact” Component for Triage Systems
We have long recognized that triage systems designed for access maximization may have different algorithms for what to do with a case than those designed for poverty minimization, as those deployed by community-based advocacy organizations might choose to develop. One … Continue reading
Posted in Technology, Transparency, Triage
1 Comment
Legal Aid Interagency Roundtable Inaugural Meeting is Springboard for Federal ATJ Initiatives
The Federal Government Legal Aid Inter-agency Roundtable met for its inaugural meeting on February 29. The Roundtable is under the White House Domestic Policy Council and DOJ. As Co-Chair Attorney General Loretta Lynch put it: “The consequences of limited access … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Justice Generally, Dept. of Justice, LAIR, White House
2 Comments
Recommending the Weekly SRLN Twitter Trends List — Showing Just How Much Innovation is Spreading
I thoroughly recommend SRLN’s recently launched Access to Justice Twitter Trends. Originally developed for SRLN Working Group members, the weekly listing is now available to all through the new SRLN website (itself massively redesigned from the old one.) Based on … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Justice Generally
2 Comments
A Reassuring Thought During Hard Times For Those Who Believe in Facts, Fairness, Reason and Rules
I think it is fair to say that those of us who are working for access to justice believe in “facts, fairness, reason, and rules” for resolving disputes at both the individual and societal level. The access to justice movement … Continue reading
Jim Sandman’s Comment on the Nomination of Judge Garland and Access to Justice
Many of us have been wondering about the potential implications of the nomination of Judge Garland for access to justice. Well, here is one very important clue, a comment by LSC President Jim Sandman. Jim is, of course, a former … Continue reading
Posted in Access to Justice Generally, Federal Courts, Supreme Court, White House
Comments Off on Jim Sandman’s Comment on the Nomination of Judge Garland and Access to Justice
DOJ Dear Colleague Letter on Fines and Forfeiture is Another Game Changer
As the Times reports, DOJ has issued and sent to all the state chief justices and state court administrators a Dear Colleague letter on the subject of court fines and fees. The helpful and positive tone of the letter is … Continue reading